Following the Sunflower movement, the idea of Taiwanese independence has at last lost its bad name.
Some pundits maintain that young people are simply acknowledging the “status quo,” and not seeking a declaration of independence, as Taiwan already has de facto independence, its name being the Republic of China (ROC). This reasoning is flawed and ill-informed.
It is simply not true that advocacy of independence can be considered maintaining the “status quo.” In international law, there are only two categories: The de jure state and the de facto entity. There is no such thing as a country with de facto independence. Public law theory and international practice hold that the “status quo” is that Taiwan is a de facto entity, or even a regional government, or that legally speaking, it remains a part of China. Visa exemption agreements, reciprocal judicial assistance, consular privileges, and any participation in international organizations, albeit under a different name, that Taiwan enjoys are due to allowances made unilaterally by other countries, not because these countries recognize the nation as independent.
Malcolm Evans’ International Law is very clear on the matter: Whether an entity can become a state is determined by whether that entity itself claims to be a country and wants to be recognized as such.
That is, Taiwan will never become a country until it actually declares independence.
A declaration of independence will also have the result of bidding farewell to the old system and choosing a new set of values. If this were anything short of a thorough overhaul and restructuring of the system and a psychological shift that includes transitional justice, to bring about a diverse culture and put human rights back on track, what would the point of independence be?
When in power, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) not only failed to launch an investigation into past wrongs, it even employed swathes of bureaucrats who had worked for the old totalitarian regime and were complicit in it. It also followed in many of the old ways of the previous regime, doing things such as forbidding Yoshinori Kobayashi, author of the Japanese comic book On Taiwan (台灣論), from entering the country. The DPP administration also failed to push through on the 40-year-old Guanghualiao Estate (光華寮) case thrown out of Japanese courts because the original plaintiff had the China UN seat; did not know how to respond to China’s enactment of the “Anti-Secession” law; refused to remove radioactive waste from Orchid Island (Lanyu, 蘭嶼); and shied away from renaming China Airlines, of which the state owns more than a 70 percent stake. These instances of serious violations of democratic values were the result of expediency and of maintaining the “status quo.”
Declaring independence could also give Taiwan’s disillusioned young people renewed vision and hope, and wipe away the bad press they have been given about their supposed inability to engage with the world. Who knows how many opportunities will be created for them to go out into the world and engage with the international community simply by our joining the UN?
Former colleagues of mine, more erudite than myself, from Germany, France, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, are now all posted overseas or hold positions as department heads in UN institutions. Will young Taiwanese be afforded such opportunities by relying on the independence the nation has in the “status quo”?
Chris Huang is an associate professor in National Tsing Hua University’s Institute of Law for Science and Technology.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations