In nine days, Taipei voters are set to elect a new mayor for the nation’s capital. What makes this mayoral race unprecedented is that a candidate nominated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has been trailing a non-KMT candidate by double-digit percentages in almost every public opinion poll.
Given that the party has traditionally enjoyed a lead of at least 10 percent over opposition candidates in Taipei mayoral contests, and that a non-KMT candidate has never beaten a party nominee in a one-on-one race, independent candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) leading the KMT’s Sean Lien (連勝文) by a comfortable margin is something that deserves in-depth analysis.
Although elections are often about personality, strategy, policy and finance, most media outlets and voters tend to be more interested in the first two elements, while finance usually determines the degree of success of a campaign’s image-building and strategy implementation. However, Ko represents a break with this stereotype.
First, he does not possess a charismatic personality and also lacks government experience. He has been a surgeon for 30 years, and formerly led National Taiwan University Hospital’s Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation division for 17 years. He is outspoken, but tends to be too “candid” for a politician. The Lien camp took advantage of this, but ironically failed to score any political points.
The main reason for that failure is that Ko has introduced a new type of candidate to the voters by being candid, direct and consistent, which is not the traditional image of politicians.
Lien once was seen by voters as a young reformer within the KMT, especially when a year ago, he accused President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration of being arrogant toward the public and obsessed with internal power struggles. Yet, after winning the party’s nomination, Lien sought Ma’s support by kowtowing to the unpopular president.
Furthermore, contrary to Ko’s step-by-step ascent in his professional career as a physician and public servant, Lien was born to one of the nation’s richest families and has never experienced the hardship that most young people have. Despite Lien being younger than Ko, he is seen by most younger voters as a “princeling” and an heir to his family’s riches. Being rich is not a sin, but Lien’s track record does not demonstrate dedication to society, especially when compared with Ko’s longtime provision of medical services.
Second, the campaign strategies employed by both camps have contributed to the widening of the gap. While Lien’s camp has used negative tactics to attack Ko by alleging that his private account at the hospital was utilized for money laundering and corruption, the lack of concrete evidence to back these claims only boosted Ko’s popularity.
Facing passivity from hardcore KMT voters on expressing their support for the party’s candidate, the Lien camp played up the “terror card” over the past weeks by warning that Ko’s victory would herald the resurgence of the push for Taiwanese independence and the extinction of the Republic of China.
Sean Lien’s father, former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), openly defamed Ko on this matter. The motivation behind such a last-ditch strategy was to provoke a confrontation between the blue and the green camps so that KMT supporters would be forced to come out and vote for Sean Lien.
Meanwhile, Sean Lien’s mother, Lien Fan-yu (連方瑀), denied that Ko was one of the doctors that saved her son’s life four years ago when he was shot in the face. In reality, Ko, as then-director of National Taiwan University Hospital’s surgical and trauma division, organized a team to care for Sean Lien.
In contrast, Ko has refrained from using negative campaign strategies to attack his opponent and has been consistently promoting the idea of surpassing partisan divisions, in particular the blue-green divide.
The independent hopeful successfully clocked the pulse of society’s craving for transparency, efficiency, bipartisanship and moderation. Running as an independent candidate, instead of representing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), helps Ko reconcile the blue-green divide.
Moreover, as a physician to both former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the DPP and Sean Lien, Ko impressed many voters in a televised debate with his KMT rival by saying he saw no “color” when treating them. According to various polls, Ko outperformed Lien in the critical debate.
The physician also set some precedents in bringing about clean, efficient elections. Ko unveiled all his campaign finances to be more transparent, unlike his opponent, who has spent more than NT$100 million (US$3.24 million) on television and newspaper ads. Ko has spent nothing so far, using social media for campaign publicity. He stopped accepting campaign donations three weeks before election day and has spent the lowest amount of any candidate in the history of Taipei mayoral elections.
He refused to produce campaign flags or hold mobilized campaign rallies; instead, he established panels to nominate the future heads of the Taipei City Government’s departments — if he wins — and put them up for public approval.
Ko’s ability to govern might have not been tested yet, but he is smart enough to realize that the national mood has changed. Exhausted by partisan disputes and extremism regarding the unification or independence dichotomy and ethnic division; the country wants its politicians to work together and compromise.
So if Ko is elected on Nov. 29, it would not be just a personal victory, but a revolution for Taiwan’s politics and electoral culture, inspiring future leaders who have their eyes on attaining high-ranking positions. This is what is called: “the Ko Wen-je phenomenon.”
Liu Shih-chung is president of the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under