President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) recent remarks that the nation’s wealth divide is one of the world’s smallest demonstrate that he is still more focused on numbers than the real financial challenges that ordinary workers and families face.
Addressing a small and medium-sized enterprise conference on Oct. 28 in Taipei, Ma said that last year the average annual disposable income of the top 20 percent of the nation’s households was 6.08 times greater than that of the bottom 20 percent, an improvement from the 6.39 times recorded in 2001.
Ma said at the conference that the difference in average incomes earned by the top 20 percent of individuals and the bottom 20 percent had narrowed steadily since 2001 to 4.08 times last year, with the Gini coefficient — a commonly used measure of inequality — reaching 0.336 last year, the lowest level seen in more than a decade, according to data compiled by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS).
A Gini coefficient of zero indicates complete equality of income, while a figure of 1 indicates complete inequality. Taiwan’s Gini coefficient of 0.336 for last year is in the middle of all nations surveyed in the Institute for Management Development’s annual global competitiveness survey and, of course, Ma likes to claim that narrowing the income gap is one of his administration’s most significant achievements.
However, the problem is that official statistics fail to accurately reflect the actual distribution of incomes in the nation. Even more alarming is that official statistics cannnot reveal the real concentration of wealth in the hands of the rich, who also earn income from property or stock sales.
The growing concentration of wealth in the hands of the few also reflects a nation that has been laboring with sluggish economic growth and stagnant wages for many years, as DGBAS statistics indicate that wages have accounted for a declining share of the nation’s GDP over the past 20 years, in contrast with corporate earnings, which have seen an increasing contribution during the same period. Last year, employee wages constituted only about 45 percent of GDP — one of the lowest levels in the world.
In addition, from 1992 to 2012, the contribution of wages to GDP decreased by 5.5 percent, in comparison with a 3.7 percent gain in corporate earnings over the same period, suggesting that an increasing proportion of Taiwan’s growth in GDP has gone to wealthy corporate shareholders rather than to employee salaries.
So, when Ma repeatedly claims that the nation’s economy is recovering, one has to ponder what recovery he is alluding to, why wages remain flat after almost 15 years and whether the economy is working for the interests of the majority, or for the wealthy elite and big business.
On the other hand, a growing wealth gap is part of an international trend. Earlier this month, the World Economic Forum released a report saying that rising income inequality and unemployment would be the top challenges facing global leaders next year, while Credit Suisse said in its annual global wealth report last month that global wealth inequality has increased since 2008, with the wealthiest 1 percent of the world’s population possessing 48.2 percent of global wealth, up from the 46 percent last year. The bottom half of people hold just 1 percent of global wealth, by comparison.
The increase in the wealth divide is now a global issue and the situation in Taiwan reflects this, with the issue threatening national competitiveness and social stability. After gaining international attention with his controversial book Capital in the Twenty-First Century, published last year to address the issue of income inequality, French economist Thomas Piketty was due to visit the nation for the first time yesterday.
It will be interesting to know what his thoughts on the issue are with respect to Taiwan, especially during the current period of weak economic growth.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and