President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) recent remarks that the nation’s wealth divide is one of the world’s smallest demonstrate that he is still more focused on numbers than the real financial challenges that ordinary workers and families face.
Addressing a small and medium-sized enterprise conference on Oct. 28 in Taipei, Ma said that last year the average annual disposable income of the top 20 percent of the nation’s households was 6.08 times greater than that of the bottom 20 percent, an improvement from the 6.39 times recorded in 2001.
Ma said at the conference that the difference in average incomes earned by the top 20 percent of individuals and the bottom 20 percent had narrowed steadily since 2001 to 4.08 times last year, with the Gini coefficient — a commonly used measure of inequality — reaching 0.336 last year, the lowest level seen in more than a decade, according to data compiled by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS).
A Gini coefficient of zero indicates complete equality of income, while a figure of 1 indicates complete inequality. Taiwan’s Gini coefficient of 0.336 for last year is in the middle of all nations surveyed in the Institute for Management Development’s annual global competitiveness survey and, of course, Ma likes to claim that narrowing the income gap is one of his administration’s most significant achievements.
However, the problem is that official statistics fail to accurately reflect the actual distribution of incomes in the nation. Even more alarming is that official statistics cannnot reveal the real concentration of wealth in the hands of the rich, who also earn income from property or stock sales.
The growing concentration of wealth in the hands of the few also reflects a nation that has been laboring with sluggish economic growth and stagnant wages for many years, as DGBAS statistics indicate that wages have accounted for a declining share of the nation’s GDP over the past 20 years, in contrast with corporate earnings, which have seen an increasing contribution during the same period. Last year, employee wages constituted only about 45 percent of GDP — one of the lowest levels in the world.
In addition, from 1992 to 2012, the contribution of wages to GDP decreased by 5.5 percent, in comparison with a 3.7 percent gain in corporate earnings over the same period, suggesting that an increasing proportion of Taiwan’s growth in GDP has gone to wealthy corporate shareholders rather than to employee salaries.
So, when Ma repeatedly claims that the nation’s economy is recovering, one has to ponder what recovery he is alluding to, why wages remain flat after almost 15 years and whether the economy is working for the interests of the majority, or for the wealthy elite and big business.
On the other hand, a growing wealth gap is part of an international trend. Earlier this month, the World Economic Forum released a report saying that rising income inequality and unemployment would be the top challenges facing global leaders next year, while Credit Suisse said in its annual global wealth report last month that global wealth inequality has increased since 2008, with the wealthiest 1 percent of the world’s population possessing 48.2 percent of global wealth, up from the 46 percent last year. The bottom half of people hold just 1 percent of global wealth, by comparison.
The increase in the wealth divide is now a global issue and the situation in Taiwan reflects this, with the issue threatening national competitiveness and social stability. After gaining international attention with his controversial book Capital in the Twenty-First Century, published last year to address the issue of income inequality, French economist Thomas Piketty was due to visit the nation for the first time yesterday.
It will be interesting to know what his thoughts on the issue are with respect to Taiwan, especially during the current period of weak economic growth.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry