Let’s face it: The US political system is broken.
The midterm elections were a stinging repudiation of US President Barack Obama, but Republicans should also feel chastened: A poll last year found US Congress less popular than cockroaches.
So congratulations to those members celebrating election victories. However, our democratic institutions are in trouble when they can not outpoll cockroaches, which did not even campaign.
“Politics is the noblest of professions,” then-US president Dwight Eisenhower said in 1954, and politics in the past often seemed a bright path toward improving our country.
Former US president Bill Clinton represented a generation who regarded politics as a tool to craft a better world, and Obama himself mobilized young voters with his gauzy message of hope. He presented himself as the politician who could break Washington’s gridlock and get things done — and we have seen how well that worked.
I am in the middle of a book tour now, visiting universities and hearing students speak about yearning to make a difference. However, they are turning not to politics as their lever, but to social enterprise, nonprofits, advocacy or business. They see that Wendy Kopp, who founded Teach for America in her dorm room at Princeton University, has had more impact on the education system than any current senator, and many have given up on political paths to change.
A national exit poll conducted by Edison Research found that a majority of voters disapproved of Republicans and Democrats alike, and only 20 percent trust Washington to do what is right most or all the time.
Obama is licking his wounds in the White House, and he does not seem to accept that the election is a judgement on his presidency. I am sorry. When Democrats lose in Colorado and struggle in Virginia, when voters say they are sending a message to the White House, it is time for Obama to shake up his staff, reach out beyond his insular circle of longtime aides and recalibrate.
Critics are right that the president should try harder to schmooze with legislators, although I am skeptical that Republicans are that charmable. After all, some polls have shown more than one-third in the Republican Party said he was born abroad and about one-fifth suspected that he could be the antichrist.
Yet it is not just Obama who is looking ragged today. The entire political system is. Political scientists Nolan McCarty, Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal have charted the attitudes of the political parties back to 1879 and they found party polarization in recent years to be greater than at any time since their charts began.
That is partly because Democrats have become more liberal, but mostly because Republicans have become more conservative — indeed, more conservative than at any time since 1879.
Politicians have also figured out what works for their own careers: playing to their base, denouncing the other side and blocking rivals from getting credit for anything. Since many politicians are more vulnerable in a primary than in a general election, there is not much incentive for compromise.
After Obama took office, Republicans assiduously tried to block him, even shutting down the federal government. Republican governors prevented their own citizens from getting health insurance through federally financed Medicaid. I see that as obstructionism, but it paid off in these midterms.
Bravo to Obama’s comments on Wednesday about trying to cooperate with Republicans on issues including early education. However, I am not holding my breath. Incentives today militate against bipartisan cooperation, and that is one reason the current Congress is on track to be the least productive in the post-World War II era.
One bright spot in the midterms was voter referendums. They did actually break the gridlock. Oregon, Alaska and the District of Columbia legalized marijuana in some situations. Five states supported an increase in the minimum wage.
Washington State approved universal background checks for gun purchases. California reduced prison sentences.
So even if politicians are stalemated, voters managed to get things done. Yet we also get the national government we deserve, and that is an indictment of all of us.
I find the US’ political dysfunction particularly sad because I have spent much of my journalistic career covering people risking their lives for democracy, and sometimes dying for it — from Taiwan to Ukraine, Congo to South Korea. It was 25 years ago that I saw people massacred near Tiananmen Square for demanding political change. They risked their lives because they dreamed that democracy would improve their lives and give them greater freedom and dignity.
For those of us in the US it was easy. We painlessly inherited democracy, yet I am afraid we have botched it.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations