Two things were clear long before the votes were counted on Tuesday night: US President Barack Obama would face a US Congress with more Republicans for his final two years in office and the results would be seen as a repudiation of his leadership.
However, that was not the way Obama saw it. The electoral map was stacked against him, making Democrats underdogs from the start, he said. In addition, his own party kept him off the trail, meaning he never really got the chance to make his case.
“You’re in the final four,” as one aide put it, “and you’re on the bench with a walking boot and you don’t get to play.”
The Republican capture of the US Senate culminated a season of discontent for the president — and might yet open a period of even deeper frustration. Sagging in the polls and unwelcome in most competitive races across the nation, Obama bristled as the last campaign that would influence his presidency played out while he sat largely on the sidelines. He privately complained that it should not be a judgement on him.
“He doesn’t feel repudiated,” the aide said on Tuesday night.
However, in a hyperactive, deeply polarized time in history, Obama faces a daunting challenge in reasserting his relevance in a capital that is set to soon shift its attention to the battle to succeed him. If the hope-and-change phase of his presidency is long over, he wants at least to produce a period of progress and consolidation to complete his time in the White House.
He began that effort yesterday when he held a news conference and talked of conciliation with Republicans, and he plans to host Republican and Democratic leaders at the White House today. At the same time, Obama is eager to throw off the constraints of a campaign that he did not direct and begin to defend his record in a more robust way, aides said.
“He’s going to be aggressive. He’s ready to go,” said another senior official, who like others did not want to be identified discussing plans before the election results were tabulated. “We’ve got a lot of important stuff to get done in the lame duck. He’ll talk about that tomorrow. We’ve got a lot of important stuff to get done in the last two years. He’s anxious to get going on that.”
To Republicans, it sounded as if Obama was hardly chastened or heeding the message of the election, evidently more eager to find excuses than to rethink the way he has governed. Absent a change in attitude from the president and a genuine outreach on issues that matter to them, the next two years could simply usher in even more political squabbling, Republicans said.
“There’s a huge opportunity to get things done if his frame of mind is in the right place, and it’s not clear it is,” said Sara Taylor Fagen, who was former US president George W. Bush’s political director when he lost Congress in 2006. “He’s never shown an interest or willingness to work with members of Congress. Talk to Democrats — they don’t feel he ever made an effort to court them. It’s not clear he’ll make an effort to court Republicans.”
Republican representative Adam Kinzinger said both parties needed to find a way to get past their mutual suspicions to forge a new working relationship.
“He feels burned, and we feel burned too,” Kinzinger said. “For four years, it’s been a lot of mistrust on both sides.”
Just two years after Obama’s re-election, the midterm results underscored just how far he has fallen in the public mind. Nearly 6 out of 10 voters on Tuesday expressed negative feelings about his administration, according to exit polls. For every two voters who said they had cast ballots to support Obama, three said they were voting to express their opposition to him.
The electorate was deeply pessimistic about the nation, with 7 out of 10 describing the economy as not so good or poor and 8 out of 10 expressing worry about the direction of the economy in the next year.
Numbers like that discouraged Obama’s aides, who said they had not done a good job reporting the president’s record, saying that the deficit has fallen by half, unemployment is now below 6 percent, the price of gasoline has fallen sharply and the economy is growing at a decent rate.
Obama and US Vice President Joe Biden talked about that at a lunch last week, according to an administration official, and Biden later gave voice to it in a CNN interview aired on Monday.
“We have to be more direct and clear about exactly what it is we’re looking to do,” Biden said.
However, Obama was focused on the odds against him. His staff researched it and told him that no president in more than a half-century had as many Senate seats open in states lost by the president.
“This is probably the worst possible group of states for Democrats since Dwight Eisenhower,” Obama told WNPR radio in Connecticut on Tuesday.
In those red states, Obama was politically toxic and deferred to candidates who asked him to stay away. In the last days of the campaign, he visited just five states, compared with 10 states visited by Bush in similar circumstances in 2006.
“The White House concluded that it should be the responsibility of those individuals who have their names at the top of the ballot to drive the strategy,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said.
Obama understood in some cases, but privately resented others.
“We think that was a mistake,” one aide said.
Obama’s irritation became clear when he said publicly that even if he was not on the ballot, his policies were, a comment that Republicans gleefully wrapped around the necks of their Democratic opponents. So Obama held his tongue, but privately kept quizzing his political director, David Simas, about the latest information on early voting.
Obama had long ago given up hope that he would be able to push through some of his priorities before leaving office. He told a former aide several weeks ago that he knew he would never be able to expand prekindergarten as he had once hoped and that he regretted it. However, he hopes for possible deals on corporate taxes, trade and infrastructure, and he plans to use the lame-duck session of the departing Democratic Senate to push through as many nominations as possible.
Whether Republicans are open to dealing with him in the new year remains uncertain. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and other conservatives are set to resist. However, Speaker John Boehner is scheduled to have one of the largest House Republican caucuses in modern times, giving him more room to maneuver because he can afford to lose some dissenters if he makes common cause with Obama.
Former White House adviser to Obama Anita Dunn said that voters on Tuesday were just as negative about Republican leaders as they were about Obama. In the end voters were eager not for more failure, but for progress by both parties, she said.
“The message for anybody who’s in power is that voters are looking for a change in how they approach getting things done,” she said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations