The little apartment building was graceful once. Maybe even beautiful. There is an elegance in the arched windows now covered with grime. It is there in the ornamental pillars, coated with paint so faded that it is hard to say if the building is yellow or white. It is there in the wide windows kept open through the endless hot months, bringing in the breeze from the nearby Yangon River.
The building whispers of a past. Of solid middle-class lives. Of a cosmopolitan, colonial city that was once a great Asian crossroad, the capital of a country once called Burma. However, that was a long time ago.
These days, in the late afternoons when the breeze starts to pick up, two old friends carry out plastic chairs to sit in front of a building now battered by time and monsoons and history. They talk about the neighborhood and their children. They worry about money.
Illustration: Mountain People
U Tin Win has spent 67 years in the building on 41st Street, moving in when he was six years old. His friend, Round Namar, is not sure how long it has been for her. Sixty-five years? Seventy?
“All I know,” Namar says, shrugging, “is my mother told me I was born here.”
All those years, the two have lived next door to one another, in narrow ground-floor apartments, each a little bigger than a shipping container.
From here, they watched the birth of an independent Burma, the first coup d’etat and the rise of the military juntas. They watched as generals turned Burma into a poverty-battered international pariah, and as 2010 semi-democratic elections nudged a few generals aside. In the past couple of years, they have seen construction cranes blossom across this city, long known as Rangoon, a place which had seemed frozen into a crumbling echo of British colonial life.
They have also watched the building’s residents change around them. Today, there is the strutting young print-shop manager and the sweatshop workers who look as young as 11. There is the housewife, the barely employed physicist and the hotel laundress who came from the countryside, riding a bus for 12 hours in search of something more than grinding farm work. Some are close friends. Many barely recognize one another.
This is the story of one apartment building, two stairwells, 12 tiny apartments and the 60 or so people who live in them. In many ways, it is little different from hundreds of other buildings scattered across Yangon.
However, listen closely enough in these apartments and you can hear the story of a country caught at a historical precipice, wavering between a decades-long era of brutal military rule and the promise of some vague new golden age.
On 41st Street, it is a moment so complicated that even the most basic questions are confounding.
The handsome young man leans over a small desk on the building’s ground floor, absently surfing the Web as printing presses clatter around him.
Aung Phyo Win has a life that many young Burmese would envy. He goes to dance clubs at expensive Yangon hotels and spends much of his time at work playing on the computer. He races cars with his friends in the city’s streets. He is 28 and dreams of promoting hip-hop shows. His family, by the building’s standards, is well off. Some own cars. They come to 41st Street only to work, living in nicer neighborhoods.
His country is democratic, he will tell you. Look at the elections of 2010 and the new political parties. Look at the protests. Small protests are now regular occurrences in front of Yangon’s city hall, with a couple dozen people railing against illegal land seizures or high electricity rates. Just a few years ago, those protests would have been met with arrests or even gunfire.
Yes, Aung acknowledges, the army could end the protests anytime it wants. It still wields immense power.
“They just don’t want the bad publicity overseas,” he says.
As he talks, an elderly employee who sweeps the press-shop floor sits transfixed in front of a television. She is watching Psycho on cable TV, the sound turned up loud. Janet Leigh is screaming.
Yes, he acknowledges again, some people are still too frightened to talk politics. Not him, though. The young men who go clubbing with him offer Myanmar-style protection.
“I don’t worry,” he says. “I’m friends with the sons of generals.”
However, one after another, his neighbors in the building turn conversations away from anything political or ask that their names not be used. Many still talk about politics in whispers and only with their closest friends.
“The generals, they still control everything,” said one resident, an older man. “There is democracy the world over today. But Burma?”
He paused, and shrugged: “Maybe someday.”
So much in Myanmar’s history has been about fear.
During the five decades of junta rule, tens of thousands of people were imprisoned for political crimes. Torture was commonplace. Activists disappeared into prisons, reappearing years later as twitching shadows. Foreign journalists were effectively barred. Protests were crushed. For three generations, children were taught not to speak about anything sensitive. Informants, they were told, were everywhere.
However, the junta was also increasingly desperate for international respect and an end to crippling trade sanctions. Quiet discussions about democratic changes led to the release of the Nobel-winning pro-democracy activist Aung San Suu Kyi, and then to the carefully orchestrated 2010 elections, when former military commander General Thein Sein was elected president.
Four years later, the country’s political culture can appear upended.
Those protests are now regular occurrences and a welter of independent newspapers have opened. Opposition parties are growing. While some political prisoners still sit in Myanmar’s jails, hundreds have been freed. The junta’s former spymaster, once a deeply feared man known as the Prince of Darkness, now runs a small Yangon art gallery and cafe where cappuccino sells for US$2.50 a cup.
However, despite all that, the military-backed party remains in control and the army has the constitutional right to dissolve parliament. A mysterious circle of current and retired generals is widely thought to weigh in on all important government decisions. While press freedoms are theoretically protected, journalists are regularly harassed by the authorities and sometimes arrested. Reporters acknowledge avoiding certain topics, including the wealth of the generals and the often-raucous behavior of their sons and grandsons.
The confusion is evident on 41st Street. Most often, it is evident in what is left unsaid. Even between friends.
“We come out here to talk about everyday things,” Namar says, her voice rising nervously, as she and Win sit in front of the building late one afternoon. “We don’t talk about politics.”
Her extended family, 11 people crowded into an apartment carved into closet-sized rooms, is among the building’s poorest. They depend on what she and two daughters earn selling snacks on the street and a son-in-law’s work as a mechanic. They have almost nothing, but she will not risk losing any of it with some stray political comment.
When Namar is not around to get nervous, though, Win sometimes wades into questionable territory.
He is a cheerful dandy, a former neighborhood playboy who dons a clean shirt and carefully oils his comb-over before his afternoon gossip sessions. He married late in life and he flirts with passing women as his much-younger wife rolls her eyes. Talking politics one afternoon, he points to the narrow but well-paved road that runs in front of the apartment. For decades it was little more than a swath of potholes and pitted cement.
However, just before the 2010 elections, the military-backed USDP party came through the neighborhood, announcing they would fix it. The repair may have improved his neighborhood, but he sees it as a betrayal.
“They did it for the votes,” he growls, and spits out a final word.
He makes it sound like a curse: “Elections.”
The oldest residents of 41st Street can remember back to World War II and hearing their parents whisper about the Japanese soldiers who occupied the city. They remember the return of the British near the war’s end and the celebrations of independence in 1948.
What they do not remember are many Burmese.
Rangoon was then barely one-quarter ethnic Burmese. The city’s top hotel was run by Armenians; the best bakery was German. The city had Jews from Baghdad and teak traders from Azerbaijan. The British were at the top of the social pyramid, but the city’s largest populations were Chinese and Indian.
The British, long accustomed to Indians from their largest colony, brought thousands to take low and mid-level jobs in Burma’s bureaucracy, and to work in British companies. Chinese immigrants dominated the business world.
The Burmese were shunted aside, their anger quietly festering.
In those days, 41st Street was the heart of Rangoon’s Indian Quarter, where middle-class immigrant businessmen and civil servants lived in apartment buildings that often echoed the Edwardian extravagance of the British colonials.
Inside, though, families often followed traditions that stretched back centuries.
“We lived in the old ways,” Fawrile says.
She is about 68, and sits in a chair with her legs pulled beneath her. She has only one name. Her father was a wealthy trader in timber and spices, a modern man with a business empire, extensive real-estate holdings and armies of servants. However, as a Muslim woman, she was rarely allowed to leave the house.
“I didn’t even know what was going on out there,” she says.
The rise of the junta upended that world. Bitterness against the Indians and Chinese was often encouraged by military governments looking for scapegoats for the country’s slide into poverty.
Starting in the 1960s, thousands of Indians were expelled from the country or, like Fawrile’s father, had their businesses nationalized. Anti-Chinese riots shook the city starting in 1967.
Today, Fawrile lives with her nephew, a taxi driver, in the family’s last apartment, a top-floor place where the breeze blows through a thin curtain and a grand-nephew sleeps on a mat on a lazy morning, wearing pajamas that say “Dog-Ass Tired.”
The building, like Fawrile’s family, is far from what it once was.
With each decade, gentility gave way a little more. The sprawling apartments were divided, and often divided again. Poor Chinese moved to the neighborhood, then poor Burmese. The 137 steps leading to the top floor became worn, grass sprouted from the rooftop. With every monsoon, more leaks opened in the roof.
These days, there is a tangled mix of ethnicities inside. At times, the building has witnessed profound tolerance, like when Namar’s family hid U Tin Win’s during waves of anti-Chinese violence.
However, the building, like Myanmar itself, is no happy melting pot. The country’s divisions are byzantine, producing everything from jingoistic political parties to ethnic armies.
Now, years of ethnic distrust are being magnified in Yangon by the city’s growth, as poor villagers flood in from the countryside in search of work.
On 41st Street, that distrust echoes.
Ma Yi Win came to Yangon three years ago, moving into a tiny top-floor apartment with her husband and two roommates. All are ethnic Burmese, refugees from rural villages. `
“We don’t know the neighbors,” says Ma Yi Win, a small, friendly woman, worn by exhaustion. “And the whole street is full of Indians, so I don’t want to be friends with them.”
In Ma Yi Win’s apartment, the linoleum floor is worn away. Buckets catch leaks from the ceiling. On one wall, earlier renters have written a message in English: “I wish you were here with me, just this moment.” Taped to another wall is a glossy poster showing a mansion with an impossibly green lawn.
Her husband, a thin man given to long silences, lights a cigarette. They dreamed for years of escaping the drudgery of home, where a year of work brought just a few hundred dollars at harvest time.
“Where I come from, in my village, there’s only farming,” she says. “If you want to do anything else, then you have to leave.”
A few years ago, that began to change. The 2010 elections marked a watershed in Myanmar. Sanctions fell away and tourists poured in.
The city, where for decades, nothing seemed to change, began stumbling into the global economy. Yangon now has a Ford dealership and a 10-story-tall Coke billboard. It has jet lagged US executives spilling from the airport, dreaming of a vast untapped market. It has sketchy businessmen who build sprawling mansions and high walls.
However, on 41st Street, the newcomers’ dreams are far more modest. A job. A salary. Maybe some savings.
Ma Yi Win found work at the laundry of a nearby hotel catering to businessmen with limited expense accounts. The hours are long, but she earns about US$100 a month, an enormous salary back in the plains.
The city both thrills her and frightens her. It has everything: wealth and poverty, gangsters and holy men. It has those Indians who make her nervous.
“When I was young, back in the village, I didn’t know about anything,” she says.
Pride fills her words: “Now I know about so much.”
Such talk is common among the building’s newcomers, most of them recent arrivals from the poorest parts of Myanmar. They do not hope for much, but they still see the city as a way to get ahead.
The older families, though, are often lost in happier memories. They barely see the new buildings and the new cars. Their dreams are of somewhere else. If not for themselves, then for their children.
“Our smart young people want to go abroad — to Singapore or Malaysia,” says U Cho Win, a gray-haired resident on the second floor. “They know what life is like here.”
He talks in careful sentences and keeps his eyeglasses on a chain around his neck. His laugh is bitter. His parents were government servants, middle-class people who expected him to move up in the world.
Once, long ago, he hoped his physics degree would earn him a place in academia, or maybe work as a scientist.
However, he graduated from college in the 1970s, when Burma’s economy barely functioned at all. He spent almost a decade unemployed before becoming a tutor for high-school students. Today, he and his wife survive on his earnings as a freelance tour guide and her US$100 monthly salary as a middle-school teacher.
Their son is 21, a seaman’s apprentice on a cargo ship. Last they heard, he was in Panama.
Life, they say, is better out there. They do not want him to come back.
So much has changed in Myanmar. So much has not.
Every few months, change also comes to 41st Street. Aung Phyo Win, the print-shop manager, left his job after a series of family arguments. The gold workshop moved away.
Ma Yi Win and her roommates, the rural emigres, are gone. They did not tell their neighbors where they went.
However, when the hot weather comes, U Tin Win and Namar can still be found out front, often sitting there deep into the night, talking to one another or to people passing by. Sometimes, they just sit silently.
There are only a couple of streetlights on 41st Street, and those rarely work. So at night, the only light outside is what spills from the apartments. However, the two friends do not mind the darkness.
The street is quieter then. More like the old days. And now when they do go inside, there is electricity most of the time. They can change for bed without lighting a lantern. They can watch TV long into the night.
Just a few years ago, they could not depend on that. It is hard to see that as an accomplishment, they say, but it is something.
It is one tiny change in a new Myanmar, a country shuffling awkwardly away from its own uneasy history, one building at a time.
Additional reporting by Esther Htusan
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and