A few days ago, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) joined Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) on a campaign visit to the Ximending District (西門町) in the hopes of connecting with the younger generation and improving Lien’s election prospects. However, security personnel created an impenetrable wall around Ma and Lien, making it impossible for them to interact with voters.
In addition, the violent way in which they handled people with opinions differing from Ma and Lien was unconstitutional. Instead of improving their electoral prospects, they created a public relations disaster.
Security seems to have become a matter of driving away and avoiding crowds, which is creating massive displeasure with the security service among the public. Not only does this hurt respect for the security personnel, it also tramples the Constitution and the law, and as such, it does more harm than good.
Whether on or off duty, the president should always be protected and enjoy certain privileges out of concern for the national interest, and there is nothing wrong with that. The issue here is that security personnel must not resort to methods that violate the Constitution and the public’s rights.
News footage clearly shows that people who expressed their disagreement with Lien and Ma in Ximending met with physical violence from security personnel, who restricted the movement of the protesters to behind the counter of a beverage shop or by pushing them into a clothing shop.
As the protesters did not resort to violence or pose any threat, the security personnel’s actions went beyond what was required to protect the physical freedom and property of those they were protecting. This was an egregious violation of the constitutionally protected freedom of expression, and it could also constitute an offense against personal freedom or coercion, which is prohibited by the Criminal Code. If the victims were to file charges, it is very unlikely that a law enforcement officer would be able to escape liability.
Article 12 of the Special Service Act (特種勤務條例) and the act’s enforcement rules clearly stipulate that law enforcement must consider the public’s freedom of expression and that they must not go beyond what is required to protect the safety of those being protected. The reason that these regulations are repeatedly ignored by security personnel demonstrates a lack of organizational culture and education among the personnel.Acting as they see fit and driving people away everywhere they go defeats the purpose of security personnel, since they are in effect isolating those they are protecting, and this results in public criticism.
Professionally performed security requires striking a balance. Security personnel must consider the law, the safety of those they are protecting and the freedom to express dissenting opinion. If protesters do not take physical action, all that is required is to keep the person for whom they are providing security separated and under their protection. This is the specialty of security personnel, and it should also be their highest priority.
At the same time, managers should strengthen internal controls and improve the training and enforcement techniques of the security personnel on the front lines, not only because any reporter or member of the public could record a violation, but also for the sake of their own professional dignity.
Ximending is not Tiananmen Square and it is only by adhering to the Constitution and maintaining administrative neutrality that security personnel will be able to smoothly carry out their duties, and gain the respect of the general public.
Su Tzu-yun is a former researcher at the National Security Council.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under