Local restaurant chain operator Wowprime Corp last week announced it was postponing a planned rally in Greater Taichung to back the firm’s demand for compensation from Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際集團) regarding the latest cooking oil scandal.
On the surface, Wowprime expected the planned protest by its 10,000 employees to send a strong message to the public about the need for credible government certifications. The move was really an attempt by the firm to boost employees’ morale and its corporate image amid growing consumer complaints, because nine products sold by its restaurants were found to be involved in the latest food safety issue.
The company has not yet announced a new date for the protest, but it might not need to do so because apparently not many people agree with the company’s view that it is a victim of the food scandals — given the company’s insincere and insufficient compensation offers to consumers, its business scope and market share.
Since all oil items imported from Vietnam by Ting Hsin have been deemed questionable and banned from sale by the government, Wowprime, like other firms, has to withdraw products that have been made using that oil, but the company’s slow response to consumers’ demands has only decreased confidence in its products, its brand and its share price.
Moreover, the issue has also battered the image of Wowprime chairman Steve Day (戴勝益), who has for many years been seen as a paragon among Taiwanese bosses, along with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀), Hon Hai Group chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) and Asustek Computer chairman Jonney Shih (施崇棠), according to various government polls and online job bank surveys.
Even so, it is the vendors working in various night markets and street stalls nationwide who have borne the brunt of and suffered most from the adulterated cooking oil scandal, as evidenced by the 2.55 percent growth from a year earlier in the nation’s food and beverage consumption in the third quarter, which was almost half the 4.58 percent annual increase seen in the second quarter.
Clearly, the food scandal’s impact on the nation’s economy is significant. The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics on Friday said that the reduced sales at restaurants after the first of the oil scandals broke in September dragged down the nation’s private consumption by NT$2.4 billion (US$78.75 million) and led private consumption to grow by just 2.43 percent from a year earlier last quarter, the lowest growth since the fourth quarter of last year. The issue hit GDP growth in the third quarter by 0.05 percentage points, the agency said.
While the Ministry of Economic Affairs estimates that exports might decrease by NT$2.3 billion this year if a ban on Taiwanese food imports by several countries continues until the end of the year, the impact of the latest food scandal will be longer-lasting. First, growing suspicions cloud the reputation of the nation’s food and quality service. Second, the effort to build a solid image of products made in Taiwan face an uphill struggle.
An obvious challenge facing the nation, especially top business leaders, is how to promote the idea of corporate social responsibility after the government’s pro-business attitude has only triggered public anger toward the corporate sector. Although Ting Hsin’s wrongdoings are set to lead to more oversight of the corporate sector’s operations and investments — economically, socially and environmentally — this issue offers a hard-earned lesson for businesses that getting rid of a bad reputation is difficult, but losing a good one is all too easy.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs