The economy is key to a country’s survival. A government’s duty in this area is not a matter of simply striving for better economic figures, but, more importantly, it is to make sure that the public as a whole gets to share in the fruits of a prosperous economy.
After the second transfer of political power, from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in 2008, the nation has made some economic progress — despite Ma’s failure to realize his “6-3-3” election campaign promise to achieve annual GDP growth of 6 percent, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and unemployment below 3 percent.
However, standing in stark contrast to this economic growth is the increasing polarization of Taiwanese society, which is tearing up the foundation upon which communities are built: mutual trust. The KMT is the main culprit in this situation.
Not long ago, Ma said that the gap between the nation’s rich and poor was not very serious compared with that of other countries. However, what happens if one compares the Taiwan of today to the Taiwan of the past?
According to the Ministry of Finance’s income data, the richest Taiwanese were 70 times richer than the poorest Taiwanese in 2009. By 2011, they were 94 times more wealthy, the data show. This is one of the problems that have resulted from the government’s negligence.
A second problem is that the government follows double standards in how it treats the public and how it treats large corporations.
The average person has to work very hard and finds it next to impossible to get any tax deductions, while the operators of large corporations who have good political connections can buy expensive mansions with fully financed bank loans. In addition, if these conglomerates should import and use tainted raw materials, the government helps them to find ways out of the ensuing scandal.
Comparing these two realities evokes a feeling of unfairness, and this feeling can in turn lead to hatred, anger and distrust. What is worse is that, based on rational economic considerations, society could deteriorate in the direction of opportunism as increasingly more people curry favor with the rich and powerful.
Although renowned economist Adam Smith sang the praises of the free-market economy, he also emphasized the importance of morals. However, he said that morality depends not only on self-discipline, but also on the government fulfilling its responsibility to provide controls. However, in today’s Taiwan, the government is negligent of its duties and Taiwanese have to suffer the consequences.
To save the nation from this crisis, Taiwanese do not only have to fight for economic development, they must also fight to create a fair economy.
Only by following the principle: “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need,” helping disadvantaged groups support themselves independently and by seeing to it that the government thoroughly implements the rule of law, will members of the public have a sense of fairness and be willing to trust the government and each other. If all these things can be brought about, then the Taiwanese community will grow closer and stronger, as it confronts the challenges posed by globalization.
Chen Tzu-yu is the vice director of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Department of Social Movement.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.