The youngest-ever Taipei mayoral candidate has adopted “Listen and Lead” as his campaign slogan, envisioning a Taipei City Government that will shape a progressive future for the capital by gathering the public’s opinions. However, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Sean Lien (連勝文) has so far waged a campaign that has reflected only the party’s antediluvian political philosophy.
Whether sharpening partisan and ideological lines is an effective electoral strategy for Taipei — where voters customarily favor the pan-blue camp — remains to be seen, but the outmoded ideas Lien has associated himself with have cast doubt on his ability to run the city the way he has pledged if he is elected.
Lien has been regarded by some as a candidate who could generate new ideas for resolving old problems because of his relatively young age — 44 — and his having no prior experience in running for public office, despite the general perception that he did not have much of a choice but to throw his hat in the ring to carry on his family’s political name.
When President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration was criticized for its perceived affronts on constitutionalism and the rule of law in its handling of several cases, Lien was one of the few KMT figures who made admonitory remarks about the president.
For example, when commenting on the legal battle in which Ma usurped judicial tools to try to remove Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) from his post over allegations that Wang had tried to unduly influence a court case, Lien sarcastically said: “We are not living in the Ming Dynasty,” in an apparent reference to the importance of upholding the rule of law.
However, the way Lien responded to the tainted cooking oil scandal suggests he is no less inclined than Ma to place politics above the law. Lien has pandered to populist rhetoric by saying that penalties for food safety violations should be made severe enough to be “daunting” or force violators to “shut down.” He proposed implementing a 10-year ban on the sale of tainted food products in Taipei and setting a fine of up to NT$200 million (US$6.56 million) for offenders.
These proposals seem to contravene the spirit of the rule of law, as the central government legally has sole authority to order the removal of products from store shelves, not a local government, while the maximum fine a local government can impose is capped at NT$100,000. Lien looked far beyond the boundaries of local governments’ authority to address the food safety issue.
Another example of the KMT administration politicking at the expense of the rule of law is its attempt to scrap regulations governing criminal fines imposed by a court on a legal person — any public or private entity — to enable a government agency to levy an administrative penalty on that legal person immediately, subject to the prohibition against double jeopardy.
The Executive Yuan proposed an amendment to the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation (食品安全衛生管理法), mainly in response to the public outcry over the adulterated oil scandal in which the Ministry of Health and Welfare canceled its administrative penalty of NT$1.85 billion against Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co (大統長基) after a court set a NT$38 million fine.
Despite concerns voiced by the Judicial Yuan that the amendment would decriminalize legal persons and render it impossible to confiscate offenders’ assets — thereby deforming the judicial system — KMT whip Alex Fai (費鴻泰) has tried hard to push it through, regardless of the consequences. The proposed revision was simply a move to cater to public sentiments with the Nov. 29 elections in mind.
As effective as the Lien campaign’s efforts to connect to the KMT’s past may be at boosting turnout among pan-blue voters — including a visit to the mausoleums of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — it is wrong to bid to go back to a time when the nation was governed by dictatorship, not the rule of law.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under