Sharks have long been portrayed as man-eaters, a menace to any swimmer brave — or foolish — enough to share the water with them. However, this perception could not be further from reality. In fact, sharks are extremely vulnerable, and their dwindling populations — largely owing to human behavior — urgently need global protection.
There have been many laudable shark protection efforts in the past few years. A campaign spearheaded by the US-based organization Wild Aid has contributed to a major decline in demand for shark fin across Asia. China, for example, has banned shark-fin soup, a traditional delicacy, at official government dinners and functions — a move that contributed to a 30 percent drop in shark fin sales from December last year to April. In Guangzhou, the center of China’s shark-fin trade, vendors have reported an 82 percent decline in sales over the past two years.
It should not be difficult to spur nations to take action to protect their shark populations, given that a shark’s economic value plummets when it is killed.
A study by the Australian Marine Institute found that Palau’s shark-diving industry is worth far more than its shark fishing industry. A single reef shark that frequents major dive sites in Palau is worth about US$179,000 annually, or US$1.9 million over its lifetime; the same shark would be worth about US$108 dead.
Similarly, the shark diving industry has brought in an estimated US$110 million annually to Thailand, US$22 million to the Canary Islands and a massive US$800 million to the Bahamas over the past 20 years. It is not difficult to see why allowing fisherman to decimate these nations’ shark populations would be counterproductive.
Developing protected areas and corridors for shark migration is also important. Last month, US President Barack Obama extended the maritime boundary of the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument from 80.46km to the 322km limit, effectively merging the region’s national parks into one massive protected area, in which commercial fishing is prohibited.
Similar protected areas have been created over the last couple of years in Palau, Micronesia, Indonesia and the Maldives. Yet the new sanctuary in the Pacific — with an area equivalent in size to Texas, California, Montana and Arizona combined — could be the largest such zone in the world.
Though these measures are certainly positive steps, no nation acting alone can ensure adequate protection of shark populations. After all, sharks are global wanderers; they have no regard for the boundaries of economic exclusion zones, protected areas or countries’ territorial waters.
Shark protection efforts cannot truly be effective without coordinated international action. Such action must not only aim to protect shark populations directly; it must also address major threats to sharks, such as illegal trade, bycatch and overfishing.
Consider climate change. A recent study by the University of Lisbon’s Center for Oceanography reports that acidification from carbon dioxide emissions could cause the global shark population to decline by as much as 40 percent by 2100. Add to that the more than 73 million individual sharks that are already lost annually and the situation is clearly unsustainable.
As it stands, there is no global treaty to protect sharks. However, frameworks are in place for the development of international conservation measures. The Convention on Migratory Species, for example, has a track record of working with nations — as well as international organizations, non-governmental organizations, media and the private sector — to spur coordinated action that meets international standards.
The convention’s memorandum of understanding on shark conservation, which lists seven endangered species, has attracted 35 signatories so far. Next month, representatives from these nations are scheduled to meet in Quito, Ecuador, to discuss extending the list to include the great and scalloped hammerheads, the silky shark, thresher sharks, sawfish and mobula rays. Given how many shark species have been proposed, some have begun referring to the convention’s Conference of the Parties as the “shark COP.”
Nevertheless, proposals must give way to action. The threats facing sharks are well documented. It is time to launch concerted global efforts to protect some of the oldest, most vulnerable — and most valuable — species in our seas.
Bradnee Chambers is executive secretary of the UN Environment Program Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this