Nearly everyone has a digital footprint — the trail of so-called “passive data” that is produced when you engage in any online interaction, such as with branded content on social media, or perform any digital transaction, like purchasing something with a credit card.
Passive data, as the name suggests, are not generated consciously; they are byproducts of our everyday technological existence.
As a result, this information — and its intrinsic monetary value — often goes unnoticed by Internet users.
However, the potential uses of passive data are not lost on companies. They recognize that such information, like a raw material, can be mined and used in many different ways.
For example, by analyzing users’ browser history, firms can predict what kinds of advertisements they might respond to or what kinds of products they are likely to purchase.
Even healthcare organizations are getting in on the action, using a community’s purchasing patterns to predict, say, an influenza outbreak.
Indeed, an entire industry of businesses — operating rather euphemistically as “data-management platforms” — now capture individual users’ passive data and extracts hundreds of billions of dollars from it. According to the Data-Driven Marketing Institute, the data-mining industry generated US$156 billion in revenue in 2012 — roughly US$60 for each of the world’s 2.5 billion Internet users.
As impressive as this figure sounds, it is just the first step for the data economy. By 2020, the global Internet population is set to reach 5 billion; 10 billion new machine-to-machine connections are set to be created; and mobile data traffic should rise 11-fold.
Given the dramatic growth in the amount of data being generated, together with ever-expanding applications across industries, it is reasonable to expect that individual data could soon be worth more than US$100 per Internet user.
Within 10 years, the data-capture industry can be expected to generate more than US$500 billion annually.
Based on these projections, one might wonder what kind of compensation the creators of this multibillion-dollar data can expect.
As it stands, the answer is none at all.
Individual users are at the bottom of a broken economy. The value that their data generate is being collected by third parties and sold to whatever organization is willing to purchase it.
This does not have to be the case. The first step toward reclaiming some of the value of our own data is to view this information as an asset, rather than as a byproduct. At that point, Internet users can find ways to take control of their own creation.
Already, Facebook users can export all of their personal data as a zip file simply by clicking a link on their profiles. Presumably, they could sell that information directly to the organizations that want it, instead of allowing Facebook to do so.
Of course, the data market does not yet exist on this scale, but, as Facebook’s data-export facility demonstrates, a new model that turns data into an asset and consumers into producers is not a distant prospect.
Such a model would empower billions of Internet users by making them beneficiaries of a transactional exchange — one that adds value in every direction.
Beyond enabling individual Internet users to monetize their data, this model would benefit data buyers by connecting them more closely to consumers — not least by diminishing the mistrust that can arise when users are not complicit in the sharing and use of their data.
Indeed, firms that acknowledged that personal data are personal property would be in a better position to build relationships with individual consumers, thereby gaining deeper insights into their specific needs and desires.
If passive data are worth hundreds of billions of dollars when sold by third parties, the data that individuals choose to share — reliable, honest insights into their motivations as consumers — should be worth much more. By recognizing the individuals behind the data, companies can access and share in that value, within a fully inclusive data economy.
Personal data is exactly that — personal. People should choose whether to share it, and they should be able to share it on their own terms.
Nathan Eagle is the chief executive officer of Jana, a company named by the World Economic Forum as a “Technology Pioneer.”
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry