The US Supreme Court on Monday unexpectedly cleared the way for a dramatic expansion of gay marriage in the US and may have signaled that it is only a matter of time before same-sex couples can marry in all 50 states.
Rejecting appeals from five states seeking to preserve their bans, the Supreme Court effectively made such marriages legal in 30 states, up from 19 and the District of Columbia, taking in every region of the country.
While the ruling stops short of resolving for now the question of same-sex marriage nationwide, it is a major victory for advocates of gay marriage.
It continues a dramatic turnaround on the issue across the US in recent years, with gay marriage generally winning approval in court cases, state legislatures and public opinion polls.
Almost immediately, exuberant couples began receiving marriage licenses previously denied to them.
“This is the dream day,” Sharon Baldwin, a plaintiff in a challenge to Oklahoma’s ban, said, as she and her partner received their license in the Tulsa County Clerk’s Office.
Lindsey Oliver, 30, and Nicole Pries, 42, received the first same-sex marriage license issued from the Richmond Circuit Court Clerk’s office in Virginia.
Directly affected by Monday’s orders were Wisconsin, Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah and Virginia. Officials in those states had appealed lower court rulings in an effort to preserve their bans.
Couples in six other states — Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia and Wyoming — should be able to marry in short order since those states would be bound by the same appellate rulings that have been on hold.
Gay marriage has been a volatile social issue in the US during the past decade, one that has veered from helping Republicans turn out their conservative base during George W. Bush’s reelection campaign in 2004 to one that now vexes the party.
Public support has swung rapidly in favor of same-sex marriage in recent years. That is a big shift since the Massachusetts Supreme Court declared the state’s marriage ban unconstitutional in 2003, prompting states around the nation to pass marriage bans.
Lower courts have overturned one same-sex marriage ban after another following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in June last year that partially struck down a Clinton-era federal law that defined marriage as between a man and a woman.
Gay marriage proponents have since enjoyed a stunning string of legal victories, winning more than 20 court decisions around the US. Cases were filed in the 31 states that prohibit same-sex marriage.
While county clerks in a number of states quickly began issuing licenses to gay and lesbian couples, in some other states affected by the court’s action, officials did not sound ready to give up the fight.
However, their legal options are limited.
Monday’s terse orders from the court were contained among more than 1,500 rejected appeals that had piled up over the summer.
The outcome was not what either side expected or wanted. Both gay marriage supporters and opponents had asked the court to resolve whether the constitution grants same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide.
The justices did not explain why they decided to leave that question unanswered for now. They may be waiting for a federal appeals court to break ranks with other appellate panels and uphold state laws defining marriage as between a man and a woman. Or they may see little role for themselves as one court after another strikes down state marriage bans.
Still, the import seemed clear. What the justices did in virtual silence on Monday “has to send a signal to the other courts of appeals that the Supreme Court does not think it’s so wrong to allow same-sex couples to marry, and that even conservative justices don’t think they have a good shot at getting five votes. And that sends a message that this essentially is over,” said Jon Davidson, legal director of Lambda Legal, an advocacy group for gay rights.
Leaders of the National Organization for Marriage predicted a backlash in the form of renewed efforts to pass a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
“The notion that the people have nothing to say about this — that unelected judges are going to decide it for us — that’s preposterous,” organization chairman John Eastman said.
However, efforts to pass such an amendment have gained little traction, even in past years when support for same-sex marriage was less robust.
Organization president Brian Brown acknowledged that any renewed efforts would be “long and arduous.”
Freedom to Marry president Evan Wolfson called on the high court to “finish the job” with a national ruling.
Wolfson said the court’s “delay in affirming the freedom to marry nationwide prolongs the patchwork of state-to-state discrimination, and the harms and indignity that the denial of marriage still inflicts on too many couples in too many places.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry