On Sept. 25, aviation police held up a China Airlines civilian flight bound for the US from Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport after discovering components for missile warheads during security checks. The incident caused alarm at the airport and among local security agencies, raising concerns that the weapons parts were being smuggled out for a terrorist organization. It was subsequently revealed that the components belonged to the Ministry of National Defense, which was sending faulty components back to the US for repair, and that the concerns were unfounded. The incident was widely reported by local media and although it was confirmed to be a false alarm due to a misunderstanding — to the relief of many — it should never have happened.
The parts the military was sending to the US for repairs were from a guidance system for 36 AIM-120 missile warheads. This is a matter of some gravity, which should have been conducted in secrecy, but for some reason the ministry neglected to inform the Aviation Police Bureau during preparations to ship the components. The bureau would have been guilty of serious dereliction of duty had it failed to discover the shipment. Imagine if these military weapons were being sent by anyone other than the authorities, or if it were possible to get such equipment through Taiwan’s airports without any checks being done. This is the stuff of nightmares. What if this military equipment had been shipped in the absence of any kind of security measures and had been nabbed en route by terrorists or a terrorist organization?
It is just as well that the airport police did hold up the weapons. At least it shows that the nation’s airport security is effective. However, at the same time, it also reveals how sloppy the defense ministry’s operating procedures are. The transportation of advanced missile systems components should have been kept secret, and yet, due to inadequate communication between the ministry and the aviation police, as well as procedural negligence by the airline in its failure to ensure proper documentation — stating that there were no safety concerns — the bureau’s intervention was exposed. As a result, details such as the method by which the military transports equipment, the model and exact number of missile warheads being sent for repair on this occasion, and that the US was willing to replace the warhead components for free, were laid out for all the world to see.
Taiwan finds itself in unusual circumstances. Purchasing military weapons is complicated. The US, under the terms of the Taiwan Relations Act, provides Taiwan with weaponry to protect itself, but to avoid interference or objections from China, any activity involving weapons procurement or maintenance, or personnel training, needs to be discreet or conducted in absolute secrecy. Despite this, and even though the personnel involved have a duty to maintain confidentiality, they cannot be careless and omit any of the administrative procedures or notification protocols. In this case, the omission of a simple notification document meant that the method by which the military transports major pieces of military equipment has been revealed, and details about US-Taiwan military cooperation exposed. The defense ministry and the entire national defense system will need to be thoroughly reviewed, and those responsible for these lapses disciplined.
Due to the negligence of the military, all and sundry now know certain defense secrets, making the ministry a national and international laughing stock. The defense ministry cannot pass the buck to the aviation police or China Airlines. It needs to conduct an internal and external review of its practices, and establish new procedures for the transportation of military equipment. It cannot allow this kind of thing to happen again and expose itself to more ridicule.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this