Globalization is in retreat. Despite all of its undeniable benefits, it has spawned problems of governance and management that have exposed the inadequacy of national governments and international institutions.
This has left people everywhere, rich and poor alike, struggling to cope with problems — from failed states to failed banks, from overfishing to underemployment, from climate change to economic stagnation — to which globalization has contributed, but cannot address effectively. Fragile institutions have given rise to a political backlash and the danger of disaster on many fronts.
Added to a new isolationism of many nations is the fact that governments, multinational corporations and international bodies can often find themselves too distracted to maintain the perspective that they need to build a comprehensive problem-solving agenda. For political leaders, facing electoral calendars or other short-term pressures, “long-term planning” can mean just four years, or even less.
Likewise, private-sector managers and company directors have to meet annual or quarterly profit targets, sometimes at the expense of their firms’ longer-term best interests — to say nothing of the well-being of society as a whole. Academics can be adept at identifying problems, but they often struggle to win the full attention of decisionmakers and can be subject to legal, financial or political constraints. Also, though regional and global international organizations have had some successes, they are too often paralyzed by national rivalries and a shortage of money.
Yet, interdependence is undeniable. From carbon dioxide and Internet governance to depleted ocean fisheries and corporate tax avoidance, many of the world’s problems today are innately transnational. The current Ebola outbreak that is ravaging much of west Africa and threatens to spread elsewhere is yet another stark example of this.
Clearly, the world’s 7.2 billion people need not only new ideas, but also new ways to build a consensus that involves all stakeholders in moving the best ideas from theory to practice. None of the many issues identified, both within and among states and societies, can be addressed effectively without thorough and continuing consultation across the spectrum of stakeholders.
Here, thankfully, there is some good news: The world is not short of intelligent people. Governments, corporations, civil-society groups, academia and international organizations are full of experts who can, when brought together, achieve a critical mass of insight.
Also, modern communication tools mean that ideas and good practices can be disseminated worldwide at unprecedented speed. Multinational corporations and villagers alike can share the fruits of progress. For example, the mobile phone-based microfinance and banking system known as M-Pesa has spread in various forms across and beyond east Africa, where it originated.
Meanwhile, private and public laboratories worldwide are incubating technologies and materials with which the future will be built. From messenger RNA therapeutics to the mining of metals from desalination brine, new research and development promises new opportunities for progress.
The world is full of ideas — many of them excellent — in technology, sustainability and governance; unfortunately, the capacity to build consensus and to roll out effective programs is much rarer. No one doubts that ideas are the fuel of human progress and development. With fragmentation threatening to replace globalization, the urgent need now is to share concepts, insights and good practices that can bring people together and head off dangers.
Martina Larkin is head of the World Economic Forum’s Network of Global Agenda Councils.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations