The People’s Climate March on Sunday was a watershed for the emerging global climate movement, with more than 400,000 people taking to the streets of New York City. However, New York was only the tip of an iceberg.
People in 166 countries, from Argentina to Australia, participated in more than 2,800 events and rallies.
Two million activists demanded through an online petition that governments shift to 100 percent clean energy.
For the first time since the fated 2009 Copenhagen Climate Change Conference, virtual climate activism moved into the real world. Why?
Citizens worry about the impact of climate change, and they know that fossil fuels are the problem.
They have come to recognize that powerful interests are blocking the necessary shift to clean energy, and they simply no longer trust that their governments are doing enough to stand up for the future of the planet.
This was reflected not only in the record number of people who participated, but also in the diversity of the marchers — urban activists, indigenous groups, adherents of different faiths and political viewpoints, and, most conspicuously, old and young.
People today draw natural connections between climate change and daily life. Teachers stood for schools that run on renewable energy, women supported healthier agriculture, grandmothers demanded clean air for their grandchildren, unions want a green job transition, and city mayors want investments in energy-efficient buildings.
Five years after the Copenhagen conference failed, governments finally need to act responsibly.
This week’s climate summit, hosted by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, was aimed at increasing the momentum for action by gathering government, business and civil-society leaders. The aim was to create favorable conditions for governments to negotiate a climate deal in Paris next year.
Though the UN cannot enforce the promises leaders made, the summit catalyzed a popular demonstration that has moved the political spotlight back to the climate-change challenge, where it is likely to remain until governments take credible action.
What has changed since 2009 is the degree of concern about the impact of climate change.
In the interim, New Yorkers faced Hurricane Sandy, while Typhoon Haiyan devastated the Philippines. Climate records continue to be broken worldwide. This year alone, ordinary people suffered from heat waves in Australia, floods in Pakistan and droughts in Central America, while the collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet has been shown to be irreversible.
As a result, the global debate has shifted from the costs of action to the costs of inaction. Though the costs of climate damage are staggering, scientific research indicates that mitigation costs are manageable.
That has become apparent in the growth of renewable energy generation. People want clean energy, the technologies are available and profitable, and, with millions of people lacking access to reliable power, the emergence of renewable sources is a lifesaver.
Global wind and solar energy capacity has tripled since 2009, and renewable energy sources now provide more than one-fifth of the world’s electricity supply.
Indeed, every second megawatt of new electricity that is added globally is green, implying that the share of energy from renewable sources could reach 50 percent by 2030.
Clean energy is a game changer, because it puts power over power back into the hands of citizens, posing a direct challenge to the fossil-fuel industry.
The obvious next step in the fight against climate change is to phase out all subsidies for that industry.
This week’s UN climate summit may not affect the course of negotiations for an international climate agreement.
However, it has put the focus back where it should be: Real people demanding real change from their governments.
Citizens have shown that they are committed and will speak up. The People’s Climate March was only the beginning.
Monica Araya is founder and executive director of Nivela and leads the citizens group Costa Rica Limpia. Hans Verolme is founder and senior strategic adviser at Climate Advisers Network.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations