The People’s Climate March on Sunday was a watershed for the emerging global climate movement, with more than 400,000 people taking to the streets of New York City. However, New York was only the tip of an iceberg.
People in 166 countries, from Argentina to Australia, participated in more than 2,800 events and rallies.
Two million activists demanded through an online petition that governments shift to 100 percent clean energy.
For the first time since the fated 2009 Copenhagen Climate Change Conference, virtual climate activism moved into the real world. Why?
Citizens worry about the impact of climate change, and they know that fossil fuels are the problem.
They have come to recognize that powerful interests are blocking the necessary shift to clean energy, and they simply no longer trust that their governments are doing enough to stand up for the future of the planet.
This was reflected not only in the record number of people who participated, but also in the diversity of the marchers — urban activists, indigenous groups, adherents of different faiths and political viewpoints, and, most conspicuously, old and young.
People today draw natural connections between climate change and daily life. Teachers stood for schools that run on renewable energy, women supported healthier agriculture, grandmothers demanded clean air for their grandchildren, unions want a green job transition, and city mayors want investments in energy-efficient buildings.
Five years after the Copenhagen conference failed, governments finally need to act responsibly.
This week’s climate summit, hosted by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, was aimed at increasing the momentum for action by gathering government, business and civil-society leaders. The aim was to create favorable conditions for governments to negotiate a climate deal in Paris next year.
Though the UN cannot enforce the promises leaders made, the summit catalyzed a popular demonstration that has moved the political spotlight back to the climate-change challenge, where it is likely to remain until governments take credible action.
What has changed since 2009 is the degree of concern about the impact of climate change.
In the interim, New Yorkers faced Hurricane Sandy, while Typhoon Haiyan devastated the Philippines. Climate records continue to be broken worldwide. This year alone, ordinary people suffered from heat waves in Australia, floods in Pakistan and droughts in Central America, while the collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet has been shown to be irreversible.
As a result, the global debate has shifted from the costs of action to the costs of inaction. Though the costs of climate damage are staggering, scientific research indicates that mitigation costs are manageable.
That has become apparent in the growth of renewable energy generation. People want clean energy, the technologies are available and profitable, and, with millions of people lacking access to reliable power, the emergence of renewable sources is a lifesaver.
Global wind and solar energy capacity has tripled since 2009, and renewable energy sources now provide more than one-fifth of the world’s electricity supply.
Indeed, every second megawatt of new electricity that is added globally is green, implying that the share of energy from renewable sources could reach 50 percent by 2030.
Clean energy is a game changer, because it puts power over power back into the hands of citizens, posing a direct challenge to the fossil-fuel industry.
The obvious next step in the fight against climate change is to phase out all subsidies for that industry.
This week’s UN climate summit may not affect the course of negotiations for an international climate agreement.
However, it has put the focus back where it should be: Real people demanding real change from their governments.
Citizens have shown that they are committed and will speak up. The People’s Climate March was only the beginning.
Monica Araya is founder and executive director of Nivela and leads the citizens group Costa Rica Limpia. Hans Verolme is founder and senior strategic adviser at Climate Advisers Network.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.