When studying in England more than a decade ago, most of my local friends, Scots included, snickered at the Scottish independence movement. It was never very popular and most people believed it was just a strategy for getting money from the central government. Yesterday, Scots went to the polls to vote for or against independence. It is hard to predict which side will win.
The impetus behind the Scottish independence movement has developed over a long time. In the 1980s, then-British prime minister Margaret Thatcher cut social welfare, and her Conservative government’s right-wing policies that discriminated against the working class were very unpopular in Scotland. After New Labour came into power in Britain in the mid-1990s, it promoted regional autonomy, pulling the Scottish and Welsh nations together and using this to solve the dispute in Northern Ireland.
The policies of Scotland’s current ruling party, the Scottish National Party (SNP), are closer to social democracy and their opinions are even more leftist than those of the Labour Party. For example, New Labour removed controls on tuition for higher education, leading to increases in tuition fees. Under the SNP, the Scottish government has kept its policy of free tuition for Scottish students, but not foreign students, including those from England.
The Conservative Party, currently in power in Britain as part of a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats, is implementing an austerity policy that cuts social welfare payments and public expenditure. It is also using this as an opportunity to privatize public firms, including some public health services, and this has been opposed by many in Scotland. One of the main demands of the independence referendum is to uphold social welfare and stop public expenditure cuts. About three weeks before the referendum, independence supporters declared that they would safeguard the public health system.
The reason why the Scottish independence movement has turned British politics upside down is the Labour Party has lost its advantageous position in Scotland. Even if the referendum does not pass, the British government has promised to give Scotland more power over taxation and social welfare. However, this will only increase the contradictions in Britain’s constitutional system. For example, because England does not have an autonomous parliament, English members of the British Parliament cannot influence Scotland’s internal affairs, while Scottish MPs can vote and decide on England’s internal affairs, creating an imbalance in regional power. Regardless of the result of the referendum, it will have an impact on Britain’s constitution.
The rise of the Scottish independence movement is something that Taiwanese should reflect upon, because independence movements can learn from different political and economic ideologies and social visions. Public opinion in Scotland predominantly leans toward social democracy, differentiating it from England. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which claims to support Taiwanese independence, has in recent years been mocked by social groups as just being a smaller version of the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — one of the reasons being that its policies on wealth, tax and big businesses are similar to those of the KMT.
If the DPP limits itself to talking about stimulating the economy like the KMT does, fails to address real-estate hegemony and complains about President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), while touting its mantra of lighter taxes and a downsized government, the independence that the DPP talks of is built on a very shallow basis indeed.
Li Shang-jen is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of History and Philology.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry