The Sunflower challenge
Leaders of the Sunflower movement have urged the US government to review their nation’s “one China” policy, for it only helps the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to manipulate the “status quo,” slap the US’ face and trap Taiwan in a political purgatory.
Sunflower leaders held a press conference on Thursday last week at the National Press Club in Washington and urged the US government to listen to claims from the younger generation of Taiwan.
The US’ “one China” policy allows the Republic of China (ROC), under the cover of Taiwan’s governing authority to represent Taiwanese in kowtowing to China. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) always plays the two-faced trick of championing the ROC inside Taiwan and Taiwan in the international community to fulfill his life’s dream of unifying Taiwan with China. Ma has repeatedly abused Taiwan’s credit to prolong the final years of the ROC government-in-exile.
Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) said that there is “a surge of powerful strength in Taiwan from the younger generation. They do not belong to the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] or the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP]. It is a modern civil power. The US is too naive to believe that its ‘one China’ policy will maintain peace and stability in the Western Pacific. It is just the other way around, not only allowing the PRC to swallow Taiwan step by step, but seriously hurting the US’ interests in East Asia and the South China Sea. The US’ ‘one China’ policy is out of date; it is time to completely review and revise it.”
Chou Fu-yi (周馥儀), a member of the Black Island National Youth Front, has said that the US owes a debt to China for being so courteous and conniving in its gradual suppression of Taiwan. Taiwan’s younger generation has lost confidence in the US.
Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷) criticized the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) for having a double standard and wrongly deciding that the Sunflower movement had been organized by the DPP.
Under the US’ “one China” policy and given the efforts by the KMT to promote ties with China under the so-called 1992 consensus, the DPP has tried to freeze the Taiwan independence clause in its charter, Chen said. He urged the US to listen to the voices of the public, not the politicians’.
Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said the Sunflower movement has nothing to do with the DPP. He said David Brown — a professor and an AIT board member — was wrong to link the movement to the DPP without any evidence. He believes Taiwan and US uphold the same democratic values.
Who should have the right to determine the future of Taiwan, the 1.3 billion Chinese or the 23 million Taiwanese? China has continued to grow the US’ “one China” policy and now is big enough to annex Taiwan.
The US’ “one China” policy was first mentioned in the Shanghai Communique on Feb. 28, 1972. China and the US each have their own versions. The US acknowledged China’s claim of sovereignty over Taiwan, but did not agree to it. Then-US National Security adviser Henry Kissinger did not think there would be a “one China” at all because of the ROC’s anti-communist policies.
The KMT and Chinese Communist Party have drunk together and ended their family feud and now there is “one China” in the modern world. The US can no longer play with ambiguous policy.
In Taiwan today more than 90 percent of the people call themselves Taiwanese, not Chinese. It is time for the US to officially derecognize the ROC and declare that Taiwan is not part of the ROC or part of the PRC.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with