Without continued investment in community health workers, whose costs are modest compared with those of traditional healthcare systems, it will be difficult for the international community and national governments to stop the spread of the epidemic.
In sub-Saharan Africa, any child with a fever should receive immediate medical care to prevent death from malaria or pneumonia. However, as panic about the spread of Ebola grips Liberia — as well as Sierra Leone, Guinea and Nigeria — people there are increasingly associating clinicians and healthcare facilities with exposure to the disease. Ensuring that they continue to seek care when they need it requires improvements to frontline clinics and investment in locally hired community health workers to reach the vulnerable in their homes.
To be sure, the shortcomings of Liberia’s healthcare system long preceded the Ebola outbreak, with about 28 percent of the country’s four million citizens lacking access to adequate facilities. The 2003 Accra Comprehensive Peace Agreement may have ended years of civil war, but it left the country with only 51 doctors and decimated infrastructure.
Illustration: Mountain People
With very few qualified healthcare professionals, repairing the healthcare system demands more than building new hospitals and clinics across Liberia’s densely rainforested countryside.
Fortunately, the government, like others in sub-Saharan Africa, recognizes the need to invest in training community health workers in rural counties to treat diarrhea, pneumonia and malaria — the three major causes of death in children under five years old.
By definition, community health workers have deep relationships with their communities, including traditional healers, which enables them to help the formal healthcare system calibrate its approach. At the same time, mobile technologies facilitate quality control and supervision, while providing the health workers with expert clinical support.
In March, the Liberian Ministry of Health, in collaboration with UN agencies, USAID, local and international NGOs and private companies, created a comprehensive scale-up plan for the country’s community-health program. However, Ebola struck soon after, shifting attention to clinics, quarantines and reports of cures.
The WHO has played a central role in coordinating the international response along with national governments, aid groups like Doctors Without Borders, and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). With the epidemic still growing, the public-health community is attempting to mount an effective response, using a US$100 million funding boost to deploy clinicians, epidemiologists and other experts.
To put this in context, the Liberian plan unveiled in March estimated that a national community health workers network would cost about US$20 million annually. To be sure, investments in community health workers should not come at the expense of critical public-health measures to slow the spread of Ebola or support for frontline clinics. However, without continued investment in community health workers, whose costs are modest compared to those of traditional healthcare systems, it will be difficult for the international community and national governments to stop the spread — and prevent the recurrence — of Ebola and other devastating epidemics.
There are two basic approaches to building a healthcare system. One has hospitals at the center and clinics radiating outward; the other is founded on social networks and mobilized by community health workers. If the first is too rigid, diseases and their social context evolve beyond its means. If the second is too flexible, the ability to carry out technically complex work is compromised.
Striking the right balance is particularly challenging in areas where access is limited or trust is lacking. Doing so in the midst of an epidemic is even more complicated, owing to the social dimension of epidemics.
So, how people respond when a child or family member falls ill is shaped by their friends’ and neighbors’ experiences, the availability of healthcare services and the community’s perception of those services; this response, in turn, determines how and to what degree the disease will spread.
As a CDC expert explained, community health workers are the key to stopping Ebola, because anybody who shows symptoms of the disease becomes a “suspected patient,” all of whose contacts must be followed for another three weeks.
“Every day, except Sunday, the workers report their findings to a supervisor,” the expert said.
One organization, Last Mile Health, has built a network of 300 community health workers that serves 30,000 patients, providing access to basic clinics even in places like hard-to-reach Konobo, Liberia. The organization’s hybrid structure is capable of addressing regular challenges, while retaining the flexibility to respond to extraordinary developments.
As the rainy season approaches, threatening to facilitate the emergence of multiple epidemics that will overwhelm the healthcare system’s capabilities, the need to mobilize, train and equip citizens to respond has become even more urgent. This demands a combination of targeted development aid, domestic investment, expert support and on-the-ground perspectives from sub-Saharan countries that have successfully scaled up community health worker networks.
The same is true for all of the countries with active Ebola cases. Indeed, buttressed by the organizations behind the One Million Community Health Worker campaign, these countries are already working to scale up community health workers. However, they need more support, and international agencies and development banks remain too focused on containing the Ebola epidemic to offer the needed backing.
International organizations must recognize that they do not have to choose between supporting traditional healthcare investments and emergency-response efforts. Long-term investment in credible healthcare systems is the only way to head off future epidemics.
Otherwise, sub-Saharan Africa’s people will forever struggle to overcome avoidable health crises.
Prabhjot Singh, a professor of international and public affairs at Columbia University, is director of systems design at the Earth Institute and chair of the One Million Community Health Worker Campaign in sub-Saharan Africa.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.