After more than a year of debate between the ruling and opposition parties, more Taiwanese oppose the cross-strait service trade agreement than support it. Even among those who support it, there are significant differences of opinion between pan-blue and pan-green camp supporters.
Of particular note is that a majority believe the agreement will have a more negative than positive impact on the nation’s economic and political interests. So, how should the government assuage public concerns and get the agreement passed through the legislature?
First, because the government overstated the benefits of the Economic Framework Trade Agreement (ECFA) in the past and because its assessments of the agreement’s benefits are extremely modest, with estimates showing that it will increase GDP by a mere 0.025 to 0.034 percent, Taiwanese doubt the promises that have been made.
Second, even if the economic benefits of the agreement outweigh its negative effects, because Taiwanese are not sure how they will fare in the face of tough competition from China, a general anxiety is prevalent.
Third, the political ramifications of the agreement are hard to evaluate, making it a guessing game.
To solve these doubts and worries, and further facilitate cross-strait cooperation and integration, the following are three recommendations for Taipei and Beijing to consider.
First, Taiwan should use Kinmen as a free economic pilot zone to promote the free flow of global products, services, capital, personnel and information. Also, if the two nations could establish a joint commission for this, they could use Kinmen as a testing ground for cross-strait economic liberalization and integration, and allow the benefits of cross-strait economic integration to be fully displayed. Also, Kinmen could be used to assess the political impact of cross-strait economic integration and allow Taipei to consider whether it is feasible to allow integration plans to be carried out on Taiwan proper.
Second, China should think about Taiwan participating in East Asian economic integration from the standpoint of mutual benefit and reciprocity, as this would increase support among Taiwanese for broadening the scope of cross-strait economic liberalization.
China should actively support Taiwan’s participation in the negotiations for the proposed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and allow Taiwan to take part in negotiations with the other potential member nations so that by the time the potential members have signed the partnership, Taiwan can also take part in it. In addition to this, China should support Taiwan participating in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Because the partnership is an economic integration agreement that involves high levels of liberalization, China will have a tough time in the short term adjusting the structure of its economy to suit the agreement, and if Taiwan was to first participate, it could provide Chinese businesses with a platform for entering the international market, which will result in a win-win situation.
Third, a referendum should be used to solve the debates going on within Taiwan over the cross-strait service trade agreement. Many opinion polls from the past show that pan-blue and pan-green camp supporters have vastly differing opinions when it comes to the agreement, which has seen the two sides locked in fierce opposition over the issue of cross-strait economic integration. However, according to an opinion poll conducted by TVBS in March, 61 percent of respondents support the idea of using a referendum to make a final decision on the agreement, with only 31 percent against the idea.
The only way to make both camps accept the final decision on the agreement is to use a democratic procedure. This would also help solve the problems of opposition and deadlock that are going on in the legislature.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.