There is almost nothing in the world that a politician loves more than a good slogan, although it sometimes seems the more nonsensical the riff, the better. Most are about as substantial as a cloud on a sunny day.
A majority of the slogans in Taiwan involve turning the nation into something different, rebranding it — “the other China” or “the real China” were two that kept the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) propaganda machine going for decades.
Then Taiwan became “an Asian Tiger” and to maintain the push for development there were proposals to turn the nation into a “green silicon island,” “regional air hub,” “regional transportation hub,” “regional democracy hub,” an “Asian financial center,” an “Asian-Pacific hub,” or as Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) urged in January — a “tertiary industry-based country.”
Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), coiner of the “regional democracy hub” idea a few years ago, appears to have been looking for something to do since announcing in May that she was dropping out of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Taipei mayoral primary. She has been working for a while on initiating a local referendum to stop the installation of fuel rods in the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, but that is tied up in court challenges and other administrative issues.
So she has hit upon a new goal — having voters declare the nation a peaceful and permanently neutral nation via a national referendum. Such a move would eliminate the risk of Taiwan being a regional flash point and allow it to boost its trade, transportation and high-tech industries as well as focus on humanitarian efforts, she said.
Taiwan could become the “Switzerland of the Orient,” she said on Thursday.
Taiwan and Switzerland might not seem to have a lot in common at first, even if you draw a Venn diagram. When people think of Switzerland, some of the first things that come to mind are the Alps, Swiss Army knives, banks, watches, Swiss cheese (Emmental), chocolate and then, perhaps, neutrality.
As for Taiwan, the Central Mountain Range may not be as high as the Alps, and Yushan (玉山) is about 640m shorter than Monte Rosa, but it is the tallest mountain in East Asia. Kinmen knives are more like cleavers, and do not have as many nifty gadgets as the Swiss Army’s, but they are made out of remains of old bombshells. Taiwan has lots of banks, and Taiwanese semiconductors are as world famous as Swiss watches. Taiwan may not have a famous cheese, but tourists from around the world flock to try beef noodle soup — and even chou tofu (臭豆腐).
Another problem is that many other places have laid claim to the Switzerland of the Orient moniker, such as the Bulusan Lake area of the Philippines and China’s Guizhou Province. Both Bhutan and Pakistan’s Swat Valley claim to be “the Switzerland of Asia” — although the Pakistani Taliban have put a crimp in Swat’s tranquility — while Singapore appears to have an almost insurmountable lead to claim the “Switzerland of banking/gold trade in Asia” title.
However, the biggest problem is the notion of neutrality — something local politicians have never been able to achieve. The blue-green split in this nation appears far deeper than the political differences that divide many other countries — such as the North-South, East-West and Democratic-Republican fault lines in the US — so the idea of a neutral nation would seem far-fetched.
Yet the biggest problem is that the fingers on the regional flashpoint trigger lie not in Taipei, but in Beijing. One of the DPP’s weak points has always been its China policy, or lack thereof, and its ability to present a cohesive plan to counter Beijing’s united front drive toward unification. Spending time and money promoting a “neutrality” pipe dream will not help anyone or achieve anything.
Taiwan would be better served by trying to become the “Swiss chocolate maker of Asia.” It is certainly a more palatable idea.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations