The series of gas pipeline explosions that rocked Greater Kaohsiung on July 31 and Aug. 1 and how its aftermath has been handled have unmasked the attitudes of Taiwanese officials who represent both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
As always, both parties seem more interested in finding fault with each other than with finding solutions, despite the severity of this event — 30 people were killed and 310 injured; among the injured, 45 of the 76 who are still hospitalized remain in intensive care units with serious burns.
While the investigation into the pipeline suspected of leaking propene continues, there is no doubt that this pipeline, along with two others that also transport hazardous liquids, should not have been exposed to air in the drainage culvert.
This is one of many issues that should not have been allowed, since the state-owned oil refiner CPC Corp, Taiwan had obtained permission to bury the three industrial pipelines beneath the urban neighborhood in early 1991 from then-Greater Kaohsiung Mayor Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who was appointed by the KMT regime, as CPC constructed the nation’s No. 5 Naphtha Cracker despite strong opposition from local residents.
Shockingly, since the installation of the pipelines more than 23 years ago in a period that saw the DPP at the helm for 16 years, not a single test has been performed to check their integrity.
None of the officials of the two parties involved, whether directly or indirectly, took the initiative to admit mistakes, tell the truth and assume responsibility until the odds appeared to be against them, such as former deputy Kaohsiung mayor Wu Hong-mo (吳宏謀) and three other high-ranking officials accused of lying about the existence of the culvert and the problematic pipeline owned by LCY Chemical Corp.
The Greater Kaohsiung Government has attempted to excuse itself from the obligation of monitoring effects of pipeline construction and operation for years, while the Executive Yuan has also tried to put the blame on the city government by saying that the pipelines transporting petrochemical products — as opposed to petroleum and natural gas — fall outside of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ jurisdiction.
Minister of Economic Affairs Chang Chia-juch (張家祝), who is also in charge of the Central Disaster Response Center, did offer to resign, but his 800-character statement revealed that he resigned over a strong grievance with the way opposition parties have treated him and made no mention of the ministry’s long-overlooked responsibility to develop and ensure regulations for safe operation of the nation’s pipeline network.
The case provides the latest testimony to the depth of the partisan divide in Taiwan. Surprisingly, it has grown to the extent that even the results of the disaster — massive casualties, 6km of destroyed roads, utility supplies to about 83,800 people in about 33,000 households affected to different degrees and the fear of more gas pipeline explosions — still failed to bridge the gap and allow both parties to set aside their feud for the greater good.
Political parties in Taiwan seldom compete on a left-right spectrum, but even so, they do not sit down to discuss issues that involve unification-independence disputes either. The relationship is obviously beyond repair when there is more finger-pointing than problem-solving.
The latest weather forecast indicates that Kaohsiung is likely to be battered by more downpours in the next four or five days. While the rain hampers reconstruction and might bring more damage, it will also bring a further test for the political parties.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Taiwan is the master of its own fate, yet the remnants and values of its colonial past still haunt the nation. The issue is not limited to Taiwan, but rather a phantasm that exists in all postcolonial states. The phenomenon is in apparent in several nations following their independence. Early examples include former Central and South American colonies once ruled by Spain, Portugal and France, and more recently Asian and African nations that gained independence after World War II. The road to democracy is not a smooth one. Most elites in such countries were educated during colonial periods. Once their nation gains independence,