Cynicism has become the default setting for many people in Taiwan, especially regarding political maneuvering and government machinations. It has been rife this week, as officials and politicians have scrambled to escape blame for last week’s gas pipeline explosions in Greater Kaohsiung.
It is no wonder that cynicism greeted the announcement on Monday that the Special Investigation Division (SID) of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office had closed its eight-year investigation into the Dec. 24, 2005, sale of the Broadcasting Corp of China (BCC), the China Television Co and the Central Motion Picture Corp (CMPC) to Jungli Investment Co. The division also closed investigations into New Party cofounder and UFO Radio founder Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), then-CMPC president and now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元), and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who was then-Taipei mayor and KMT chairman, linked to the sale.
No evidence of criminal wrongdoing had been found, the division said. However, the timing of its announcements, three-and-a-half months ahead of the nine-in-one elections and while the nation is transfixed by the Kaohsiung tragedy, has aroused suspicions that the Ma administration was trying to bury the story.
The three outlets were sold as a package to China Times Group subsidiary Jungli Investment Co in a suspect deal. The three outlets were owned by the KMT — through its Hua Hsia Investment Holding Co — which had finalized the sale just one day before the deadline for political parties, politicians and the military to divest themselves of media assets, as required by a 2003 amendment to the Broadcasting and Television Act (廣播電視法). The sale also met Ma’s pledge after becoming KMT chairman the preceding August of completing the sale of the party’s controversial assets before 2008 and in a transparent manner.
In late 2006, then-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Yu Shyi-kun and three other DPP members sued the KMT on charges of fraud, embezzlement and money laundering for allegedly selling the firms at far below their market value. They said the three companies had been sold for almost NT$9 billion (US$299.3 million) less than they were worth and that a kickback scheme would give the KMT half of the profits of any future sale of the real estate owned by the outlets.
In January 2007, it was reported that Jaw had bought the BCC shares from Hua Hsia Investment, not Jungli Investment Co, and that Jungli was part of a Hua Hsia-managed trust — which implied that the KMT still technically owned the three outlets.
Questions were also raised about the manner in which Jaw bought the BCC shares, amid suspicions that he and his wife had set up dummy corporations to evade legal restrictions barring an individual from owning more than 10 percent of a radio station. The controversy over his ownership led Jaw in October 2007 to resign as BCC chairman and general manager and terminate his contract with Hua Hsai.
If anything, the sale of the three outlets looked less transparent as time went by. However, one has to wonder why it took eight years for the SID to drop the probe triggered by the lawsuit filed by Yu and others.
The SID said it had interviewed almost 100 people, and reviewed receipts and bank statements, before deciding the NT$4 billion sale price was fair because the NT$15.2 billion assessment of the outlets had been made in 2003, but their value had fallen to NT$7.82 billion by the time of the sale, and the purchaser had to shoulder the companies’ NT$5.3 billion in debts. It gave no explanation for why the outlets’ value had dropped almost by half in just two years or how Jaw was able to buy the BCC shares.
The SID may have found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing, but the deals were anything but transparent. The KMT’s ability to manipulate its assets, stolen or “legal,” remains unchecked and questions still exist for the party and Ma to answer.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry