The Chinese government issued proposals on Wednesday last week to break down barriers that a nationwide household registration system has long imposed between rural and urban residents and among regions, reinforcing inequality, breeding discontent and hampering economic growth.
Yet even as officials promoted uncomplicated urbanization and the goal of permanently settling an additional 100 million rural residents in towns and cities by 2020, they said that changes to the system — which links many government entitlements to a person’s official residence, even if that person has long since moved away — must be gradual and must protect big cities such as Beijing.
“This reform of the household registration system will be more decisive, vigorous, broad-ranging and substantive than it’s ever been,” Chinese Deputy Minister of Public Security Huang Ming (黃明) said at a televised news conference in Beijing, where officials explained the proposals set out in the document released last week.
Illustration: Yusha
However, Huang later added a caveat that displayed the caution accompanying the promises of change.
“At the same time, however, specific policies have to be tailored to the practical circumstances of each city,” he said.
Changing China’s household registration rules was one of the main planks of reform promised by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meeting in November last year, and it was reiterated in plans for more vigorous urbanization issued this year. Now, Xi’s test will be achieving that promise, city by city, despite the qualms and resistance of local officials and many long-term urban residents.
“I think there’s more hope of substantive change this time,” said Lu Yilong (陸億瀧), a professor of sociology and population studies at Renmin University in Beijing, who studies household registration divisions and their effects.
“This is more a coordinated, top-down reform, unlike in the past when local governments had more room to set their own rules. There have been changes already, and now we need a more systematic approach,” Lu said.
The barriers in China’s system of household registration, or hukou (戶口簿), date to former Chinese leader Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) era.
In the late 1950s, the system was instituted to keep famished peasants from pouring into cities. The policies later calcified into caste-like barriers that still often tie citizens’ education, welfare and housing opportunities to their official residence, even if they have moved far away from that place to find a livelihood.
The restrictions hinder permanent migration among many urban and rural areas and among regions and cities, such as Shanghai and Beijing.
“The main problem now is not the rural population moving to a local city, that’s quite easy,” said Ren Xinghui (任星輝), a researcher at the Transition Institute, a privately funded organization in Beijing, who campaigns to stop educational discrimination against children from the countryside.
“The main problem is migration across provinces and cities, and the controls imposed by the big cities against cross-region migration. That’s the key to hukou reform,” Ren said.
Despite market forces that have transformed China’s economy, many of those barriers persist. Nowadays, about 54 percent of the population lives in towns and cities long-term. However, only 36 percent of Chinese are counted as urban residents under the registration rules, government statistics show. Under a plan issued in March, the government wants the long-term urban population to reach 60 percent of the total by 2020 and the number with urban household status to reach 45 percent.
The divisions have become a source of discontent — and sometimes protest — when, for example, children from the countryside or from another city cannot enrol in a local school or take the university entrance exam where they live.
Xi and, particularly, Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang (李克強) have argued that faster urbanization should become an engine of economic growth in the coming decades. Already, 174 million of China’s 1.3 billion people are rural migrants working away from their hometowns, Yang Zhiming, a labor and social welfare official, said at the news conference.
Many economists say the barriers deter consumption by migrant workers, who are afraid to spend more of their savings.
The government document released on Wednesday last week brought together commitments, some already announced, to steadily and selectively lift some of these barriers. Some cities have already made such changes, including formally erasing the division between urban and rural registration for local residents.
Yet experts have said such changes do not mean much unless welfare, housing and other policies are also changed to overcome persistent inequalities.
In small cities with urban populations of up to 1 million, people with steady jobs and housing who meet requirements for welfare payments will be allowed to register as local residents. Similar rules will apply to larger cities, with stricter limits.
However, the proposals say that for the biggest cities, with urban populations of 5 million or more, the number of newcomers must be stringently controlled and a points system will be used to ration household registration opportunities.
The government also said, as it had before, that it would try to ease barriers that deny places in schools, healthcare and family-planning, and other public services to residents who do not have local household registration papers. Many city governments have resisted such changes, and urban residents fear the erosion of their privileges.
“A major reason why people want household registration in a city is for their children’s education,” Lu said. “The value in a hukou is mostly in education and healthcare resources, and cities want to limit who gets those resources.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs