On Tuesday, party caucuses in the legislature came to a consensus on amending the voting guidelines so they could vote on the nominees for a seat in the Control Yuan.
Then what happened?
More than one-third of the nominees — 11 out of the 29 nominees recommended by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) were rejected by the legislature, in which the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) holds a majority.
Even the nomination of incoming Control Yuan president Chang Po-ya (張博雅) was confirmed by merely a single vote.
The pan-blue camp has outnumbered the pan-green camp in the legislature for a substantial time.
On countless occasions in the past, when issues of great controversy have been sent to the legislature for deliberation and handling, the KMT has resorted to using party discipline to force its own legislators to vote the way the party wants, to pass the resolutions and draft bills that are in line with its own interests.
If the opposition parties resort to extreme measures to block issues, in the name of voting via proper procedures so as to bring issues in line with public opinion, they are called “barbaric” and blamed for causing the legislature to fall into idleness, and of opposing issues for the sake of it. The result is that the legislature is viewed as a source of political chaos.
However, if we look at how pan-blue legislators voted in the recent round of voting for the president’s nominees for the Control Yuan, it is easy to see that if party discipline is relaxed, the “representatives of the party will” once again begin to act as representatives of public opinion.
It also shows us how different results can be gained when legislative autonomy is implemented. If we look back at the time before the vote for the Control Yuan nominees, Ma gave the list of nominees strong backing and refused to admit that any of the names were nominated for past favors or that his nominations were inappropriate.
He also organized a deceptive vote at the national party congress to create the illusion that everyone within the party was in total agreement with the nominee list.
However, when we compare this to the dismal results that followed, it becomes clear that the real troublemaker behind the whole controversy over the Control Yuan nominations was not the opposition parties and not even the legislature; it was the man who wields all the power and who shows no regard for how he uses it — Ma.
To be honest, although the result of this display of legislative autonomy was surprising, there were also some nominees that were more than qualified to obtain a seat on the Control Yuan that, shockingly, were shot down as well.
If we dig deeper for the reasons for this we will discover that on the whole, the list of nominees was already infamous and this had a negative affect on the small minority of outstanding nominees who were also on the list.
Now that the Control Yuan nominees controversy is over, we should consider the political issues that have caused huge debates in the legislature in the past.
If the cross-strait service trade agreement or the government’s proposal to establish free economic pilot zones could be handled in the same way as this vote, respecting legislative autonomy and public opinion, there might still be hope of a bright democratic future ahead for Taiwan and Taiwanese politics.
Yu Mei-nu is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry