We may now have a new “most unread bestseller of all time,” as data from Amazon Kindles suggests that that honor may go to Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century, which reached No. 1 on the best-seller list this year.
Jordan Ellenberg, a professor of mathematics at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, wrote in the Wall Street Journal that Piketty’s book seems to eclipse its rivals in losing readers: All five of the passages that readers on Kindle have highlighted most are in the first 26 pages of a tome that runs for 685 pages.
The rush to purchase Piketty’s book suggested that Americans must have wanted to understand inequality. The apparent rush to put it down suggests that, well, we are human.
So let me satisfy this demand with my own “Idiot’s Guide to Inequality.” Here are five points:
First, economic inequality has worsened significantly in the US and some other countries. The richest 1 percent in the US now own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent. Oxfam estimates that the richest 85 people in the world own half of all wealth.
The situation might be tolerable if a rising tide were lifting all boats, but it is lifting mostly the yachts. In 2010, 93 percent of the additional income created in the US went to the top 1 percent.
Second, inequality in the US is destabilizing. Some inequality is essential to create incentives, but we seem to have reached the point where inequality actually becomes an impediment to economic growth.
Certainly, the nation grew more quickly in periods when we were more equal, including in the golden decades after World War II when growth was strong and inequality actually diminished. Likewise, a major research paper from the IMF in April found that more equitable societies tend to enjoy more rapid economic growth.
Even Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein warns that “too much ... has gone to too few” and that inequality in the US is now “very destabilizing.”
Inequality causes problems by creating fissures in societies, leaving those at the bottom feeling marginalized or disenfranchised. That has been a classic problem in “banana republic” countries in Latin America, and the US now has a Gini coefficient — a standard measure of inequality — approaching some traditionally poor and dysfunctional South American countries.
Third, disparities reflect not just the invisible hand of the market, but also manipulation of markets. Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz wrote a terrific book two years ago, The Price of Inequality, which is a shorter and easier read than Piketty’s.
In it, he writes: “Much of America’s inequality is the result of market distortions, with incentives directed not at creating new wealth, but at taking it from others.”
For example, financiers are wealthy partly because they are highly educated and hardworking — and also because they have successfully lobbied for the carried interest tax loophole that lets their pay be taxed at much lower rates than other people’s.
Likewise, if you are a pharmaceutical executive, one way to create profits is to generate new products. Another is to lobby the US Congress to bar the government’s Medicare program from bargaining for drug prices. That amounts to a US$50 billion annual gift to pharmaceutical companies.
Fourth, inequality does not necessarily benefit even the rich as much as we think. At some point, extra incomes do not go to sate desires, but to attempt to buy status through “positional goods,” like the hottest car on the block.
The problem is that there can only be one hottest car on the block. So the lawyer who buys a Porsche is foiled by the chief executive who buys a Ferrari, who in turn is foiled by the hedge fund manager who buys a Lamborghini. This arms race leaves these desires unsated; there is still only one at the top of the heap.
Fifth, progressives probably talk too much about “inequality” and not enough about “opportunity.” Some voters are turned off by tirades about inequality because they say it connotes envy of the rich; there is more consensus on bringing everyone to the same starting line.
Unfortunately, equal opportunity is now a mirage. Researchers find that there is less economic mobility in the US than in class-conscious Europe.
We know some of the tools, including job incentives and better schools, that can reduce this opportunity gap. Yet the US is one of the few advanced countries that spends less educating the average poor child than the average rich one. As an escalator of mobility, the US’ education system is broken.
There’s still a great deal we do not understand about inequality, but regardless of whether you read Piketty, there is one overwhelming lesson you should be aware of: Inequality and lack of opportunity today constitute a national infirmity and vulnerability — and there are policy tools that can make a difference.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under