Last year in the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), I published an article about Taiwanese singer Deserts Chang (張懸) and 71 percent of Taiwanese supporting the nation’s independence. I said that Taiwanese independence had become a brand and its followers had become increasingly loyal.
According to a survey at that time conducted by the TVBS poll center, 71 percent of Taiwanese supported independence, clearly representing a strong overall desire for freedom.
Last year, during a symposium, National Tsing Hua University sociology professor Yao Jen-to (姚人多) proposed the idea that there was no longer a market for independence or nation building and that this is something the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could do nothing about. These ideas were basically an extension of the opinions he expressed in a lecture at the university on Oct. 22, 2010, regarding the DPP’s future.
Last month, I attended another of his lectures and found that his opinions are unchanged.
After the Sunflower movement in March and April, independence has received increased attention, especially as the student leaders of the movement said they support the idea.
As a result, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and pro-unification media criticized the movement fearing its growing popularity.
Many people within the DPP believe that the Taiwan independence clause in the party’s charter needs to be frozen to facilitate interaction with China and to help ensure a DPP victory in the 2016 presidential election.
Some party representatives have also proposed that the DPP’s Central Standing Committee should add a clause to the charter stating that a concrete timetable is necessary to see the nation declare itself independent. In addition, media reports have said that DPP Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) is planning to propose that the DPP implement another of its resolutions — the 2007 resolution on making Taiwan a “normal country.”
There are all sorts of independence ideas in circulation and it is hard to say which one represents Taiwanese.
I have drawn up an independence spectrum, placing true independence on the very left and the freezing of the Taiwan independence clause on the far right. The DPP’s Resolution on Taiwan’s Future is right of the center, while its Normal Country Resolution is left of the center. A longitudinal axis represents the number of people who support each proposal and this was represented as a waveform, or more precisely, as a quantum probability wave that can be represented by a Fourier series that changes with time.
The spectrum is for independence, regardless of the wording in individual proposals, and I refer to the chart as “all inclusive” Taiwanese independence. Independence is a function of time, place and number of people, and it is not something that can be controlled by the DPP alone. All the DPP can do is tell people via its Central Standing Committee where the party currently stands on that spectrum.
During a recent visit to China, Greater Tainan Mayor William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP expressed his own opinions about independence. He said independence is not an idea that the DPP holds alone, but rather it represents a trend in the way a majority of Taiwanese think. This idea is similar to my description of “all inclusive” independence. Careful analysis and research are necessary for the DPP to decide which position it should take on the spectrum if it is to succeed in the 2016 presidential election.
Lee Yung-ming is an associate professor in the department of aerospace and systems engineering at Feng Chia University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under