Chyuan Shun Food Enterprise, which markets rice under the Sunsuivi (山水米) brand, had its grain merchant license revoked last year, but an administrative appeal the company filed with the Executive Yuan has since been approved. According to media reports, the Council of Agriculture’s Agriculture and Food Agency (AFA) quietly reinstated the license last month.
Last week the Consumers’ Foundation accused the government of “pretending to play ball” by first putting a dishonest business on the chopping block, but then letting it go. The foundation called the handling of the affair a dismal failure. The next day, the AFA released a statement expressing regret over the foundation’s comments. This whole shambles is infuriating.
In August last year, media reports and subsequent testing by the AFA revealed that three different types of rice marketed by Chyuan Shun, Taiwan’s third-biggest grain merchant, contained rice imported from Vietnam, while being presented as entirely grown in Taiwan.
In September, the AFA tried to assuage public indignation by hurriedly adding a new regulation to the effect that any grain merchant penalized three times within one year then caught again would have its license revoked.
The result of sample inspections for the third quarter again included one of Chyuan Shun’s products as not being up to standard, this time for containing too many broken grains. On Dec. 12, the Agriculture and Food Agency imposed a stiff penalty on the company by revoking its grain merchant license on the grounds that it had seriously broken the rules on four occasions within one year, adding that Chyuan Shun was the first grain merchant in 60 years to have its license revoked.
The AFA said it was canceling Chyuan Shun’s license in accordance with the law. If this was the first such cancellation in 60 years and if it was done according to the law, one wonders why the Cabinet’s administrative appeal review committee could so easily demand that the original penalty be canceled on the grounds that the timing of the sample inspections was wrong.
How could so many at the AFA, with all their experience of inspecting food products, not know that revoking the license on the basis of sample inspections carried out before the new regulation was introduced would be a violation of procedural justice? Yet the AFA did just that. Was it a move designed just to satisfy consumers?
After Chyuan Shun mixed cheaper Vietnamese rice into its allegedly 100 percent Taiwanese rice, public prosecutors indicted three people, including the company president’s son, on fraud charges, accusing them of having made NT$32,813,130 (US$1.1 million) in profit by illegal means. This was the 19th violation of regulations by the company in two years. Is it in keeping with social justice to reinstate the license of a company that has repeatedly broken the rules?
On May 29, Council of Agriculture Minister Chen Bao-ji (陳保基), frustrated over the Food Administration Act (糧食管理法) and draft legislation relating to farmers’ pensions and other matters being stuck in the legislature for so long, called on government and opposition party lawmakers to get a move on and do something about the prevailing injustices. Now, however, the government stands accused of “pretending to play ball” in relation to the revocation and reinstatement of Chyuan Shun’s commercial license.
This issue has damaged public faith in the authorities. Officials of the AFA, which is part of Chen’s ministry, may have expressed regret over the affair, but should they not also be held at least partly responsible?
Lin Wei-chih is an agriculture and food researcher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry