In what some might consider a surprising development, China — currently the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide — is emerging as a global leader in climate policy as it seeks to build a cleaner and more efficient economy. China’s efforts to curb pollution and environmental destruction, while shifting to a more sustainable growth model, can provide valuable lessons for governments worldwide.
The first step toward sustainable economic growth is to recognize, as China’s leaders have, that pollution — produced largely through coal-fired power plants — is profoundly damaging citizens’ lives and livelihoods, particularly in major cities like Beijing and Shanghai. Moreover, greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to climate change, the effects of which, as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warns, could prove devastating for all countries, with China highly vulnerable.
China is already the world’s largest oil importer and energy demand continues to increase rapidly. As a result, energy security has become a serious issue.
In this context, efforts to accelerate the shift of China’s growth model to one that is more innovative, inclusive, efficient and sustainable represents the only feasible way forward. Some progress has already been made — innovation is occurring rapidly and clear plans are being formed and implemented.
China is now the world’s largest investor in clean energy, with a record US$68 billion channeled toward the development of renewable energy sources in 2012 and another US$54 billion last year. Furthermore, its non-fossil energy resources more than doubled from 2005 to last year, while the carbon dioxide intensity of GDP fell by 28 percent. And China’s reliance on coal-based energy is decreasing.
However, much more needs to be done. Over the past eight years, China’s economy has grown by an average of 10 percent annually — a total increase of about 115 percent — leading to a 53 percent increase in carbon dioxide emissions. Fortunately, China’s government recognizes the need to pursue more stable, higher-quality GDP growth. At the same time, given slower growth in world markets and the challenges of domestic structural adjustment, the annual growth target has been reduced to about 7.5 percent.
These structural adjustments are aimed at reducing China’s dependence on heavy industry and manufacturing exports while fostering domestic consumption, promoting higher-tech activities and improving the services sector. This shift will naturally bring about a decline in demand for energy-intensive raw materials like iron, steel and cement. At the same time, it will better equip China for the next stages of its development.
To support these efforts, China is to build generating stations that rely on natural gas, nuclear power and renewable energy sources. The government has already pledged US$286 billion to the development of renewable energy sources and US$376 billion to energy-conservation projects from 2011 through next year. Investment in coal-fired electricity generation has been shrinking year-on-year since 2005.
As a result, by 2020, China’s consumption of energy generated from sources other than fossil fuels should be roughly equivalent to Japan’s total energy consumption. Non-fossil-produced energy will comprise 15 percent of China’s overall energy mix, reaching 20 to 25 percent by 2030.
Along with more stringent restrictions on coal consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions, the upcoming 13th Five-Year Plan, for 2016 until 2020, will include additional investment in research and development. With this mix of policies, Chinese carbon emissions could peak by 2030, even as the economy grows at a rate of 4 to 5 percent. Coal consumption is likely to peak by 2025.
These targets may be ambitious, but they are achievable. With a sufficiently strong commitment from policymakers and businesses, China could reach its clean-energy goals ahead of schedule. Moving to a path that offers a reasonable chance of preventing the average global temperature from rising more than 2?C above the level reached in the late 19th century — the established international goal — requires that other countries, too, accelerate progress.
This transformation promises not only to benefit the environment, but also to create new sources of economic growth and employment opportunities. The Chinese dream of 1 billion citizens living in thriving cities — with access to high-quality education, job opportunities in high-tech industries and a thriving services sector — can become reality.
And the benefits will not be limited to China. Other countries can learn from China’s experience through observation and collaboration. At the same time, they can benefit from the technological advances and cost reductions enabled by Chinese investment in research and development into renewable energy sources and its deployment. Finally, China’s deepening commitment to sustainability could improve the chances that the UN’s climate conference in Paris next year will produce a global agreement.
The global nature of environmental challenges creates an important opportunity for international cooperation based on shared interest. Such cooperation should extend beyond emissions-reduction targets to technology transfer, knowledge sharing and economic opportunity. Policymakers from rich nations, in particular, should bear in mind this imperative, given their economies’ history of high emissions and greater access to technology.
While China’s economic transformation is vital to its long-term prosperity, it is one step — albeit an important one — toward mitigating the massive risks associated with climate change. Lasting progress will require a similar commitment from governments worldwide.
He Jiankun is director of the Energy, Environment and Economy Research Institute at Tsinghua University in Beijing. Nicholas Stern, a member of the British House of Lords, is a professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science, vice chair of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, and president of the British Academy.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the