Some people sincerely want what is best for Taiwan, but they do not have a good understanding of what the phrase “political accountability” means.
They keep criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), saying that the party has no future and that it is competing with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in a race to the bottom.
Others lean toward the KMT, but criticize the party for competing with the DPP in a race to the bottom.
This talk about a race to the bottom is a non-issue. Anyone who prefers the KMT and keeps criticizing the DPP because they have decided it is a rotten party is implying that both parties are equally rotten.
This matches the KMT strategy of tricking swing voters into voting for the party by saying that “there’s no difference, we’re all the same anyway” in the hope that it will make them feel that it makes sense to vote for the KMT.
The KMT already owns the patent for rotten political parties. Apart from running a tight race with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the KMT would beat any political party in a democracy hands down.
There is no need for the DPP to engage in a race to the bottom with the KMT, nor will it do so. The KMT keeps proving that it is the most rotten of them all.
The rot first started in ministries and government agencies, one after another, so that the whole place is now rotten through and through.
The source of this rot lies with inferior leaders and supporters: Two ministers have resigned due to a lack of academic ethics; a shameless official who was fired was allowed to take up a position above his previous rank in a mad rush for his retirement pension; shameless and inferior individuals have been nominated for seats on the Control Yuan; innumerable people of the same ilk as former Cabinet secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世) have used their position and power to solicit money; and convicted politicians or politicians charged with a crime are allowed to run for election.
The KMT is in a league of its own and is thus relegated to holding internal races to the bottom and competitions over who has the best connections.
This is the interaction between cause and effect that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) spoke of recently.
Ma is a problematic individual, but he still likes to find copies of himself to work for him.
The central government uses “famous” academics who like to exaggerate their importance and pander to Ma, with the result that it is now full of people known for nothing in particular except for excelling at using underhanded methods to improve their name and fame.
In local elections, whoever gets the vote is boss, regardless of whether they are part of organized crime, pro-Chinese or slow-witted.
Anyone who is loyal to the party-state and helps guarantee its continued hold on power will get a piece of the action.
If a scandal was to be revealed, anything would be done to try to cover it up and protect the person in question, and if that does not work, they are cut loose and set adrift.
The KMT’s local pashas compete in wasting money, lacking standards and being close to Ma.
They live by the motto that “if you’re well connected, nothing else matters.”
Their relationship with Ma is the sole criterion for determining the political future of the KMT’s top officials.
This is the standard that the KMT applies in its own private race to the bottom.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under