When I visit my dentist’s surgery in Moscow, I am used to being the one nervously asking questions. Yet on the day after Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was brought down, everyone here — including my dentist, the receptionist and the guy fixing the receptionist’s computer — wanted me to tell them what would happen next.
“You’re a journalist. You probably know something we don’t know,” the receptionist said. “And I don’t trust the television.”
In the aftermath of the horrific crash that took the lives of nearly 300 people, from here it looks as if it has turned a local conflict into a tragedy of global proportions.
Illustration: Mountain People
As the popular political observer Konstantin von Eggert said in the Kommersant daily newspaper: “It won’t be [the rebels] paying the price, it will be the Kremlin. Because it is Moscow, in spite of many denials issued by representatives, that is believed by the entire world to be [the rebels’] chief sponsor and protector.”
Meanwhile, ordinary Muscovites are expressing horror at the tragedy, even as they entertain some of the wildest conspiracies imaginable. My dentist, Dmitry, has served in the military and professes scorn for the rebels, whom he refers to as “undisciplined morons.” At the same time, he says there is “another side” to the disaster.
“Who benefits from portraying Russia as the monster? The Americans do,” he said. “They want to go to war with the whole world.”
At my local home improvement store, the young manager, Vitaly, launches into a tirade about how “there is an information war on” and that the US has every capability to frame “either Russia or the rebels.”
However, he, too, has tremendous disdain for the separatists.
“I don’t even know what their goals are. It all seems pointless,” he said. “They’re trying to drag Russia into world war three. Fuck them.”
A curious mixture of conspiracy theory and criticism for the separatists comes up almost every time I strike up a conversation on the fate of Flight MH17.
“Even if they didn’t bring down the plane, I have no sympathy for these whackjobs,” Konstantin, a man in late middle age who describes himself as “retired military,” told me as we line up at the grocery store.
“Separatists mean too much liability — every good tactician will tell you that,” Konstantin said confidently.
Like many Russians, he believes that the new Ukrainian government is virulently anti-Russian, pro-Western and corrupt. Nonetheless, he does not think that Russia should have taken the “political risk” of supporting the militants.
For Maria, a woman in her 30s who says she works on radio, the MH17 disaster has invoked “feelings of a coming apocalypse.”
“It’s bad enough that all of these people are dead,” Maria said. “But what if the war gets worse and more people die? How far will all of this go?”
In stark contrast to Western tabloid headlines which speak of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s missile and “Putin’s victims,” most of the people I talk to in Moscow stop short of directly blaming the president for the disaster.
This has a lot to do with how Russia’s involvement in east Ukraine is perceived to be chaotic and halfhearted to begin with. Unlike the annexation of Crimea, which saw well-trained Russian troops take control of the situation immediately, east Ukraine is a murky misadventure at best.
“The idea that the rebels are reporting directly to Putin is just funny,” Konstantin said. “I don’t even know if there is any kind of established chain of command over there.”
Vitaly is more strident, calling east Ukraine a “failure” from the start and blaming Putin’s advisers for “not advising properly.”
Vitaly does not understand how the president, whom he credits with lifting Russia “from its knees” after the turbulent 1990s, could have wanted to get involved in east Ukraine — unless “the facts were distorted for him.”
Even among strong critics of Putin, there is the sense that the Russian president himself could not have seen it coming.
“I never voted [for Putin], he’s not my guy, and I don’t agree with where he’s steering the country,” Yekaterina, a pensioner neighbor, told me. “But this absolute horror, this shocking tragedy — I can’t imagine he wanted that.”
“Few people want to directly blame Putin,” Maria said. “It makes sense. Russia has improved, but it’s still a chaotic country. It’s important for people to believe in least one person. And you can’t discount the fact that the Ukrainian leadership isn’t 100 percent trustworthy.”
One would think that in a country where disasters frequently occur due to lack of accountability and poor judgment, more people would be willing to accept that what happened to MH17 was likely a mistake, almost banal in its horror. However, for many Muscovites, the notion that some sort of conspiracy is nevertheless at work seems almost comforting, like a drug.
Both television and online trolls are eager to provide more quantities of the drug at this time by highlighting both outlandish theories that crash victims “may have been dead for weeks” and more mundane speculations of the Ukrainian armed forces trying to cover up the real cause of the disaster.
“It’s very hard for me to accept that this is all just someone’s mistake,” Vitaly said. “I don’t know if I can do that.”
None of this prevents people from identifying with the victims of MH17.
“There were many children, I heard,” Konstantin said. “Kids that probably never even heard of Ukraine, or the war, or anything like that. The innocents always suffer.”
Natalia Antonova is a Moscow playwright and journalist.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry