The Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) recently published its annual report for this year, Press Freedom Under Siege. The opening sentence of the report says that “[t]he year under review has been the darkest for press freedom for several decades...” This is something fellow journalists in Taiwan can empathize with.
In her 2007 book, Media in Hong Kong: Press freedom and political change, 1967-2005, Carol Lai (黎佩兒) gives a detailed description of the self-censorship process in Hong Kong media in about 1997. She says that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) used a carrot-and-stick strategy to greatly reduce advertising revenue for disobedient media outlets, even causing them to close down. The result was that the media did not dare criticize China.
The situation described in the book is still alive and well today: In this year and last year alone, former Ming Pao chief editor Kevin Lau (劉進圖) was attacked and stabbed, talk-show host Li Wei-ling (李慧玲) was sacked by Commercial Radio Hong Kong, advertisers turned away from Apple Daily and am730, another Chinese-language publication, and the Hong Kong government refused to issue free licenses to the Hong Kong Television Network. Even Ming Pao had to change its July 1 headline “Demonstration for universal suffrage biggest in decades” by removing “for universal suffrage.” Chinese officials increased the pressure by “instructing” Hong Kong media to be “rational and objective,” and to report positively on the Chinese economy, among other things.
According to Reporters Without Borders’ Press Freedom Index for this year, Hong Kong has dropped from 18th place in the world 12 years ago to 61st place this year.
On June 22, Bloomberg View published a column with the title “Is This the Death of Hong Kong?” in which the author William Pesek stated that “Hong Kong has nothing to learn from Beijing,” a case in point being the diametrical opposition between press freedom and news censorship — China’s press freedom is pretty much the worst in the world, ranking 175th of 180 in the Press Freedom Index.
Taiwan is not much better off. After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) returned to power, Taiwan’s press freedom ranking has dropped to No. 50 due to government interference and pro-Chinese media outlets. One good example of this is that most Taiwanese media outlets have not commented on the HKJA’s latest annual report.
The values, lifestyles and level of democratization in Hong Kong and Taiwan differ vastly from China. Taiwan and Hong Kong are close, and seeing the problems facing Hong Kong, the “Pearl of the East,” people in these two places should bring their intelligence and moral courage into cooperation with other democracies and friends to form a technological network to keep everyone informed.
Media circles in particular need to work together and connect with democracy activists in China and social activists in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong, so that they can meet the CCP’s propaganda and sycophantic “red media outlets” head-on by opposing China’s “united front” strategy and brainwashing attempts.
They should even be able to take the initiative by contacting international media outlets and organizations to provide dynamic information about the freedom of expression in Taiwan and Hong Kong in order to build international sympathy and support.
If we do not do something, it might not be long before the next Bloomberg column is titled “Is This the Death of Taiwan?”
Lu I-ming is a former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry