In November 2010, three combatants gathered in a sleek office in Washington to build a carbon emissions policy that they hoped to sell to US President Barack Obama’s administration.
One was a lawyer who had been wielding the Clean Air Act since his days at the University of California, Berkeley. Another had turned to practicing environmental law and writing federal regulations to curb pollution after spending a summer on a pristine island off Nova Scotia. The third, a climate scientist who is a fixture on Capitol Hill, became an environmentalist because of post-college backpacking trips in the Rockies.
The three were as seasoned and well-connected as Washington’s best-paid lobbyists because of their decades of experience and the relationships they formed in the capital.
Over the next two years, the lawyers, David Doniger and David Hawkins, and the scientist, Daniel Lashof, worked with a team of experts to write a 110-page proposal, widely viewed as innovative and audacious, that was aimed at slashing planet-warming carbon pollution from the nation’s coal-fired power plants.
On June 2, Obama proposed a new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule to curb power plant emissions that used as its blueprint the work of the three men and their team.
It was a remarkable victory for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the longtime home of Doniger and Hawkins and, until recently, Lashof. The organization has a reach that extends from the big donors of Wall Street to the elite of Hollywood (Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert Redford are on its board) to the far corners of the EPA, where Doniger and Hawkins once worked.
The group’s leaders understand the art of influence: In successfully drafting a climate plan that heavily influenced the president’s proposal, the organization followed the strategy used by the American Petroleum Institute -— the lobbying arm of the oil industry — to write an energy policy for former US vice president Dick Cheney during former president George W. Bush’s administration.
“The NRDC proposal has its fingerprints throughout this, for sure,” said Dallas Burtraw, an energy policy expert from Resources for the Future, a Washington nonprofit, describing how the council’s work influenced the proposed 650-page environmental regulation.
Representatives of the coal industry agreed.
“NRDC is crafting regulatory policy for the EPA that is designed to advance their agenda at the cost of American businesses and people who will pay the price through much higher electricity rates,” lobby group American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity spokeswoman Laura Sheehan wrote.
Scott Segal, who lobbies for the coal industry with the firm Bracewell & Giuliani, said in an e-mail that the council’s experts “have unprecedented access to this EPA and are able to project influence down to the details of regulatory proposals and creative legal theories.”
The US Chamber of Commerce was so certain of the council’s sway that it used the group’s proposal as the basis for its economic analysis of what it expected in the EPA rule, before the rule’s actual release.
“It is no surprise that NRDC has a great deal of influence on [the] EPA and the White House,” chamber spokesman Matthew LeTourneau wrote in an e-mail.
Since its founding in 1970, the NRDC has not sought the public profile of activist organizations like Greenpeace, but it has piled up a string of substantial legal and policy victories.
Its annual budget of about US$120 million is far higher than that of most environmental groups, in part because of board members like DiCaprio and Redford, who are the attractions at lavish fundraising galas for studio heads and Silicon Valley magnates.
In a typical event in 2011, guests at the Malibu home of Ron Meyer, now the vice chairman of NBC Universal, sipped Champagne and watched surfers paddle out to form a peace sign in the Pacific Ocean. The event raised US$2.6 million.
The council’s fundraising office in New York has also found big donors in the business world, including at Google and Goldman Sachs.
“With NRDC, I would like to think I’m getting the best bang for the buck,” Walt Disney Studios chairman and group board member Alan Horn said. “These people are steeped in expertise.”
Doniger, 62, has spent 40 years, as he put it, “using legal skills to combat pollution.” He joined the NRDC soon after graduating from law school at the University of California, Berkeley, and spent seven years as a senior clean-air lawyer at the EPA during former president Bill Clinton’s administration. He went back to the environmental group during the Bush administration and in 2007 helped write the legal briefs for a landmark Supreme Court case upholding the EPA’s authority to enact climate-change regulations.
Hawkins, 71, quit Columbia University’s law school, but returned after living with his wife on MacLeans Island, off Nova Scotia.
“It made me appreciate how magical the cycles of natural systems were, and I knew I wanted to go back and do environmental protection with my law degree,” he said.
He worked at the EPA in former president Jimmy Carter’s administration, developing regulations to cut soot and smog from smokestacks, angering industries.
Lashof, 54, who has a doctorate in energy and natural resources from Berkeley, worked at a government solar-energy laboratory in Colorado, where hikes in remote pockets of the Rockies spurred his interest in the environment. This year he became chief operating officer at NextGen Climate, the super PAC run by billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer.
Together the three men and their team worked in the group’s green 15th Street office — the space includes an energy-saving lighting system and an indoor garden wall of plants — to conceive the novel idea at the heart of Obama’s climate-change rule.
Rather than impose a uniform national standard for reducing power-plant carbon emissions, the regulation sets different limits for each state and allows states the flexibility to meet the standards by picking from a menu of policy options. Options include: creating state programs that require power plants to pay a fee for their carbon pollution; installing new wind and solar power; and making appliances, lighting and air-conditioning more energy efficient. Once enacted, such a plan could do far more than just shut down coal plants; it could spur a transformation of the nation’s electricity sector.
“It’s remarkable, it’s novel, it’s really controversial, and that’s the centerpiece of the NRDC approach,” said Charles Knauss, an environmental lawyer and a former Republican congressional counsel on clean-air law.
However, Knauss and others said the rule’s structure also made it more vulnerable to lawsuits. While clean-air regulations have historically prescribed specific remedies to cut smokestack pollution, the NRDC approach allows states unprecedented flexibility, creating multiple openings for legal attack.
To crunch numbers, the council hired the same statistics firm used by the EPA in order to ensure that the agency could more easily adopt the plan.
The cost, Doniger said, was “a few hundred thousand dollars.”
The EPA said the NRDC did not wield outsize influence in shaping the regulation. When preparing the climate-change rule, the agency sought comments from hundreds of groups, including environmental advocates, state regulators, electric utilities and the coal industry, while dozens of EPA analysts and legal experts worked on the plan.
“We had 5,000 conversations,” said Joseph Goffman, the EPA’s top clean-air lawyer. “It’s impossible to say there was any one thing.”
The EPA’s plan, for example, does not cut pollution as quickly or deeply as the council’s proposal.
Indisputable, however, is that the NRDC was far ahead of the EPA in drafting the architecture of the proposed regulation.
By late 2012, Doniger, Hawkins and Lashof had finished their proposal and began to travel across the country to present it to state regulators, electric utilities, executives and anyone else they expected to have a hand in shaping the rules. In Washington, Doniger briefed Goffman at the EPA and Obama’s senior climate adviser, Heather Zichal.
“The goal was to move this idea very quickly into the public conversation and affect as many people’s thinking as possible,” Doniger wrote in an e-mail.
EPA officials did not start working in earnest on the rule until fall last year, when they held sessions around the country to hear from regulators, utilities and many others the NRDC had by then been briefing for months. Many told the EPA that they wanted to see an innovative plan like the one they had heard about from the council, even if they did not specifically name it as the group’s plan.
“They were the first out of the gate,” former EPA top legal official Adam Kushner said. “And the first out of the gate frames the debate.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this