When Takeshi Ishida was drafted into the Japanese military in 1943, he believed he was fighting a just war to liberate Asia from Western colonialism. It was only after taking part in daily exercises in which he was trained to kill that Ishida began to question Japanese militarism.
When the full horror of Japan’s wartime atrocities became apparent in the aftermath of its surrender, Ishida devoted himself to defending the pacifist constitution imposed on the country by victorious US occupation authorities.
Now, the former Imperial Japanese Army officer is consumed with fear that young Japanese will again be sent to fight overseas, following the most dramatic shift in the country’s defense policy for almost 70 years.
On Tuesday, conservative Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Cabinet agreed to lift the longstanding ban on Japan’s troops engaging in combat overseas, a move Ishida believes could once again drag his country into a reckless war.
“What Abe is doing is destroying the principles of our pacifist constitution,” Ishida, a professor emeritus at Tokyo University, told The Guardian. “Not killing anyone abroad is, in a sense, a precious part of our heritage. Why should we have to throw it away on the orders of one man rather than through the will of the people?”
Ishida, 91, believes that Japan’s US-authored constitution is at the heart of its postwar peace.
“I came to realize that I had been indoctrinated to become a militaristic youth,” he said. “As someone who felt for a while that he had lost his identity, the peace constitution was a great encouragement.”
That tradition of pacifism is in danger of being abandoned as Abe moves to reinterpret the constitution and lift the self-imposed ban on collective defense, or coming to the aid of an ally under attack.
Japan will not attempt to revise its constitution outright — an option Abe apparently abandoned after accepting that he would not win the necessary majorities in parliament and in a nationwide referendum — but will reinterpret the “pacifist” Article 9, which prohibits the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes.
The change, which is expected to be approved by parliament — where Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party and its junior coalition partner hold majorities — would allow Tokyo to exercise collective self-defense for the first time since the end of World War II.
In practical terms, armed troops could take part in UN peacekeeping operations or be dispatched to “gray zone” emergencies that have not developed into full-blown conflict.
Critics say the most troubling aspect of all is that the Japanese military could come to the aid of an ally, leaving open the possibility that Tokyo could be dragged into war at Washington’s behest.
Abe has made building a better equipped, more robust military a cornerstone of his second term as prime minister. As a prominent figure among conservative politicians who want to change the country’s view of its wartime record, he says the current constitution compromises Japan’s ability to defend itself and its allies amid Chinese military aggression and North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.
In a televised address on Tuesday, Abe said Japan would remain a pacifist state and denied that the new policy would mean sending troops into combat zones. Instead, he said it would offer better protection to Japanese. The country’s navy, for example, would be able to help protect US warships that were fighting to defend the country, he said.
“This is for the happiness of the Japanese people,” Abe said. “Japan’s status as a peaceful country will not change.”
According to a Cabinet document on the change, Tokyo would only take action if “a country’s existence is threatened, and there are clear dangers that the people’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness would be overturned” by an armed attack on the nation or on “countries with close ties.”
However, neighboring countries that were victims of Japanese militarism in the first half of the 20th century have warned Tokyo against abandoning its pacifist principles.
“Beijing opposes Japan’s act of hyping the China threat,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Hong Lei (洪磊) told reporters in Beijing. “It’s only natural for us to wonder if Japan is going to leave the path of peaceful development that it has long been pursuing.”
In Seoul, South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Noh Kwang-il said: “Our position is that the discussions should be held on the basis of the pacifist constitution, dispelling concerns among neighborhood countries stemming from history and into a direction of contributing to peace and stability in the region.”
Abe’s push to remove constitutional restraints on the military has also attracted opposition in Japan. About 10,000 people demonstrated outside his official residence on Monday evening, followed by more similar protests the next day.
“The current constitution is the result of the sacrifice of more than 3 million Japanese and more than 20 million Asian victims of war,” 74-year-old protester Yoshihiko Murata said. “We should value it more.”
Several recent opinion polls show most voters oppose the lifting of the ban on collective self-defense.
Supporters of the change said Japan is simply adopting the same defense policy as other liberal democracies at a time of increasing uncertainty in the Asia-Pacific rgion.
“What we are trying to do now is to play a more proactive role in cooperating with regional countries in setting up a framework to protect the peace and stability of the region,” Takeshi Iwaya, who heads the Liberal Democratic Party’s security research commission, told The Associated Press.
Ishida said the effective removal of the last significant constraint on Japan’s military had come at a dangerous time for the region, citing Abe’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine as part of an attempt to foment tension with China and South Korea.
The rightward shift under Abe, including the recent passage of a state secrets law, has rekindled uncomfortable memories for a man drafted to fight in a war he now believes was tragically misguided.
“The state secrets law immediately reminded me of the peace preservation law in 1928, which made it much easier to arrest people and suppress information,” Ishida said. “Now we have this new interpretation of Article 9 of the constitution that would allow Japanese forces to fight overseas. I am worried that history is repeating itself.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry