Journalists for the Voice of America (VOA) broadcasting service who are fighting to maintain what they say is their editorial independence are now at odds not only with the US Congress, but also with their own union.
The union, the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1812, recently endorsed a bill that would change language in the charter for the 72-year-old news agency and require it to actively support US policy. That came as a surprise to some Voice of America employees, who said the legislation would make them mouthpieces for government policy. They want the union to withdraw its letter of support.
“A lot of us would welcome change and reform, but not at the cost of undermining VOA’s journalistic credibility,” said Jim Malone, a senior national correspondent at the government-financed news agency who is not a member of the union.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
In its letter, union leaders said the agency’s managers had lost sight of their mission and were trying to turn the “VOA into something they envisioned as a global variant of CNN.”
“In the end, some of the currently entrenched senior management represent a far greater threat to VOA’s journalistic independence, indeed to the very existence of the VOA,” the union wrote.
The danger, American Federation of Government Employees Local 1812 president Tim Shamble said, is that the government could withdraw its financial support if the agency continued its course. The federation represents about 40 percent of all Voice of America workers and 11 percent of the journalists in the central news division.
Even journalists who are not members of the union, like Malone, are lining up against it.
“Union leaders blundered by ignoring legitimate concerns that the bill would turn journalists into policy promoters,” he said.
The bill was approved in April by the US House of Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee and is sponsored by the panel’s chairman, Ed Royce, a Republican, and its ranking member, Eliot Engel, a Democrat. The full House is scheduled to vote on it after the Fourth of July recess. The Senate is working on a similar bill to overhaul the VOA and four other government-financed broadcasters like Radio Free Europe.
The House bill would revise the language of the Voice of America charter to state explicitly that the agency has a role in supporting US “public diplomacy” and countering propaganda from countries like Russia and China. The charter, signed in 1976, now states that the “VOA will serve as a consistently reliable and authoritative source of news. VOA news will be accurate, objective and comprehensive.” However, it adds, “VOA will present the policies of the United States clearly and effectively, and will also present responsible discussions and opinions on these policies.”
Voice of America programs — more than 70 for TV and 200 for radio — are broadcast in 45 languages and the broadcaster has affiliates around the world.
The issue has been building for some time and the changes included in the bill are supported by some prominent journalists like Walter Isaacson, a former chairman of CNN and editor of Time magazine who once led the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
Former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton has said the board — which has jurisdiction over Voice of America and the other government-financed agencies — was dysfunctional. A recent audit found numerous problems with the board’s use of contractors, along with US$3.5 million in questionable costs. The agency’s budget is about US$200 million annually.
The House of Representatives’ bill would turn the board into an advisory body and create a position for a fulltime chief executive to run the agency day to day.
Dozens of journalists at the news agency said the legislation represented a threat to its existence and that they were angry union leaders issued the endorsement without consulting members.
“I didn’t see anything that went out to members telling us that they were doing this,” said one union member, who asked not to be quoted by name in criticizing the legislation, because she did not have permission to speak on the record. “It gives the impression that we as journalists support this bill and we do not.”
She said she did not find out about the union’s support until the Foreign Affairs Committee posted the letter of support on its Web site.
Shamble denied that account. He said the decision to support the bill was made by the union’s executive committee after consulting members. The union also presented its positions at meetings, he said.
“Is it possible that people still didn’t know our position after all that?” Shamble asked. “I suppose, but I don’t know what else we could do.”
Shamble said he declined an invitation to address the matter before journalists in the newsroom because he did not want to discuss union business in front of the agency’s management. He said the union had fought to protect jobs and against efforts to rescind financing for the agency, adding that he shared concerns about some of the language in the bill.
“But I think we can work with Congress to tweak the language to fix this stuff,” he said. “The larger issue is reforming the VOA.”
Many journalists at the agency agree that changes are called for and they share frustrations about the Broadcasting Board of Governors’ lack of direction. However, they disagree with the union that legislation is the way to fix the problems.
Washington correspondent Carolyn Presutti, who is not a union member, said the fight was obscuring the larger issue: keeping Voice of America journalists from becoming agents of US policy.
“I didn’t come here to be a public relations person,” Presutti said. “The idea that I have to support the positions of whoever is in the White House is not journalism. This is bigger than the union. We are fighting for our existence.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs