The ouster of one of China’s top military figures reflects Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping’s (習近平) determination to impose his personal authority far more ambitiously than his recent predecessors.
Since being appointed party leader in late 2012, Xi has moved aggressively to make his personal stamp with campaigns against graft and official waste and by waging an offensive against liberal, Western ideas. Party and government officials and managers of state companies have fallen. Advocates for official transparency and a fairer society have been jailed.
In possibly his boldest move so far, Xi on Monday struck at the core of the military elite when the party expelled Xu Caihou (徐才厚), a retired general who had been deputy chairman of its Central Military Commission, which controls the Chinese military. The party said Xu would face charges in a military court of taking money and property in exchange for promotions and other favors.
Xi has tried to establish his authority over the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) more quickly and effectively than his predecessors Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Jiang Zemin (江澤民), and to show he is willing to tackle corruption in the politically influential military.
“The investigation started in March, so it took barely three months for Xu to be expelled from the party,” said Yang Dali (楊大利), an expert in Chinese politics at the University of Chicago. “It really shows a remarkable ability by Xi and his colleagues, and also a very strong signal to try to clean up the military and to make the military a force that is focused on military matters rather than promotions and corruption.”
The dozens of officials ensnared in the crackdown, including Cabinet figures and former executives of state-owned energy giant PetroChina Co Ltd, make this the most sweeping purge since the upending of the Chinese leadership during the Cultural Revolution from 1966 to 1976.
Xi’s forceful style is a contrast to Hu and Jiang, who were seen as relatively weak leaders who had to win agreement from others on the party’s standing committee. After Hu became party leader in 2002, Jiang resisted giving up his last official post on the military commission until two years later. By contrast, when Xi took office in 2012, Hu handed over all his party posts.
Xi has dedicated his first 20 months in power to establishing his authority over seemingly all strategic areas.
That has prompted suggestions he might be trying to roll back the consensus-oriented leadership of the past two decades and restore rule by a dominant strongman.
However, experts say collective leadership is here to stay because the party is wary of returning to the turbulence China endured under former supreme leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
Xi took charge of committees that shape policies on national security, the Internet and economic reform.
That reduced the role that Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強), the party’s No. 2 leader, plays in managing the economy, typically the premier’s responsibility.
Xi has espoused a vision of a “Chinese dream” of boosting national pride and quality of life. Abroad, he has taken an aggressive stance on Chinese sovereignty over disputed territories, squaring off against Japan and the Philippines.
After deadly attacks blamed on militant Muslims, Xi ordered an unusually severe security crackdown that produced 380 arrests in the first month. Elsewhere, activists who have called for transparency and accountability in the government have been jailed or harassed.
Moves that win Xi the most public favor appear to be campaigns to root out graft and to compel party officials to live more simply.
“I think there is a kind of core, belief conviction element to this, which is that Xi has always sounded, since being elevated to power, like someone who feels like this has been his destiny,” said Kerry Brown, an expert in Chinese politics at the University of Sydney.
“He has got all these powers and it seems to imply this kind of rather striking sense of destiny. The language he uses is increasingly grandiose and almost messianic,” Brown said.
The announcement of Xu’s expulsion followed rumors that he had been detained from his sickbed in March. Some observers had thought that Xu, 71, would be spared prosecution because of terminal cancer.
Experts said Xu was seen as an ally of Jiang, who still wields influence.
“Xu Caihou was often considered as Jiang’s man, and so probably this case indicates the further weakening of Jiang’s influence and generally the weakening of what you may call ‘old man politics,’” said Warren Sun (孫萬國), a Chinese leadership expert at Australia’s Monash University. “He probably wants to signal more clearly the arrival of the Xi Jinping era.”
Chronic corruption has fueled public frustration and Xi has said that it could threaten the party’s grip on power.
In military affairs, party leaders worry pervasive graft is weakening the PLA’s ability to fight.
The armed forces were ordered to give up most of their business interests more than a decade ago, but a secretive, authoritarian official culture has allowed bribery and other abuses to continue.
Previous Chinese leaders “had little control over the military and virtually let them have a free run, and so corruption became very rampant,” Sun said. “This is something that Xi Jinping’s predecessors did not have the guts to deal with, but now we see him take action on something that is long overdue.”
The purge of Xu eliminates an ally of one of Xi’s rivals, former Chongqing party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), who fell from power after his wife, Gu Kailai (谷開來), was accused of killing her British business partner. Gu was convicted of murder and Bo was imprisoned last year on charges of corruption and abuse of power in a case that many saw as a result of party infighting.
Similarly, the party is widely believed to be investigating retired senior leader Zhou Yongkang (周永康), a former member of the party’s apex of power who was seen as a Bo ally.
Also on Monday, the party announced the expulsions of three senior officials believed to be linked to Zhou, which observers think mean a public move against Zhou is inevitable.
“It’s a life-or-death game within the party, and you will fall if you make any concessions,” said Zhang Lifan, an independent political commentator in Beijing. “Thus you must defeat all the tigers within the party.”
Lingering uncertainty about Zhou’s fate might help Xi keep senior officials on edge.
“It creates this constant atmosphere of wariness and fear among the elite,” Brown said. “There is this extraordinary manipulation of people not really knowing what is going on, and I think that is probably something that Xi is using.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry