A billion people watched the opening match of the FIFA World Cup in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and hundreds of millions more will tune in at some point during the month-long tournament. For FIFA’s six major partners and the event’s eight official sponsors, this audience is nothing short of a gold mine. These enterprises pay tens of millions in the hope that some of the magic of the “beautiful game” will rub off on their brands — and it very well may. However, for viewers, that is probably not a good thing.
The run-up to the tournament’s kickoff was not without drama for at least one of FIFA’s partners, Budweiser, which was accused of compelling the Brazilian government to overturn a national law banning the sale of alcohol inside soccer stadiums.
Despite widespread opposition to repeal of the law, soccer’s world governing body was resolute: “Alcoholic drinks are part of the FIFA World Cup, so we’re going to have them.”
Sponsorship by companies like Budweiser, McDonald’s, Coca-Cola and convenience food giant Moy Park brings millions in revenue to the game, but what message does it send to the global audience?
Promoting alcohol, sugary drinks and fast food may mean massive profits for corporations, but it also means worse health for individuals and a costly burden on countries’ healthcare systems.
Instead of focusing exclusively on alcohol’s potential to fuel violence inside stadiums, the media should be emphasizing the damage that alcohol and processed foods are causing to the world’s population every day.
Consumption of such products continues to rise — not least because of multibillion-dollar global advertising campaigns.
Over the past decade, global soft drink sales have doubled, per capita alcohol consumption has risen and tobacco use has increased. Making matters worse, most of this growth is occurring in low and middle-income countries, which are the least equipped to handle the coming health crisis.
One factor underlying such threats to public health is classification.
Health experts have traditionally lumped diseases into two categories: communicable diseases, which are caused predominantly by infection, and non-communicable diseases, that is, everything else.
Among non-communicable diseases, there are four conditions that contribute the most to early death or disability: cardiovascular disease, chronic lung conditions, cancer and diabetes.
In 2010, these four conditions caused 47 percent of all deaths, including 9 million deaths of people under 60.
The main risk factors for developing these conditions — smoking tobacco, excessive alcohol consumption, being overweight and insufficient physical exercise — reflect deeply ingrained unhealthy behaviors.
Given that these are precisely the kind of behaviors that companies like the World Cup sponsors are encouraging, a better disease classification would be pestilentia lucro causa (PLC), or “profit-driven disease.”
The overconsumption of alcohol, tobacco and energy-rich processed foods are often framed as lifestyle “choices,” but the determinants of such choices are often removed from people’s immediate control.
The strong associations between profit-driven disease and factors such as poverty or gender suggest that wider social forces exert considerable pressure on individual behaviors that affect health.
Addressing profit-driven diseases calls for a new approach to health and to the organizations charged with protecting it. The current system does not empower the UN and other technical agencies concerned with health governance to confront the determinants of poor health effectively.
Large corporations have resources, lobbying power, advertising budgets, networks and supply chains that the UN can only dream of commanding. And while the WHO skimps by on US$2 billion a year, the tobacco industry rakes in US$35 billion in annual profits.
What steps can be taken to level the playing field?
As any soccer pundit will tell you, success depends on teamwork. First and foremost, consumers must be better informed about the long-term impact of sponsors’ products.
After all, the most effective way to compel companies to change is to stop purchasing what they sell.
When people raise their voices — say, to ban advertising for breast-milk substitutes or to demand access to life-saving drugs — big corporations often listen.
Second, policymakers must be realistic. While there is certainly room for optimism about technological advances that will help to control treatment costs, treating a growing share of the world’s population simply is not feasible.
The World Economic Forum estimates that the four major profit-driven diseases cost the global economy US$3.75 trillion in 2010, more than half of which was spent on medical care. In this context, prevention strategies are crucial.
Third, businesses have a critical role to play. Beyond being a key aspect of corporate social responsibility, curbing profit-driven diseases — and thereby ensuring the health and productivity of current and future generations — is in firms’ interest.
Voluntary codes to limit sugar in soft drinks and reduce salt levels in processed foods are a positive step, but they are far from adequate.
Finally, every successful team needs a strong manager.
In the battle against profit-driven diseases, international and national regulatory authorities must fill this role, setting and enforcing the rules of the game to protect the health of people worldwide.
The World Cup has a profound social impact, including on global health.
FIFA has a responsibility to ensure that the tournament’s viewers are not receiving a message that could make them sick.
Kent Buse is head of political affairs and strategy at UNAIDS. Sarah Hawkes is reader in global health and Wellcome Trust senior fellow in international public engagement at the Institute for Global Health, University College London.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and