On a recent student recruitment trip to Hong Kong, I talked to a few friends working in the field of education there.
“Most Hong Kong high-school students would prefer to study at a Hong Kong university. Their second choice would be a university in an English-speaking country like the UK or Australia. Taiwan would be their third choice,” they said.
I asked what Taiwanese universities had to offer Hong Kong students. After thinking about this for a time, one said: “Lower tuition fees.”
In Taiwan, the government allocates public universities, on average, only a third of what universities in Hong Kong receive, and a 10th of what they get in the West. And yet, with the exception of a small number of countries — like Germany, where the fees are similar to those charged in Taiwan — state universities in most nations, including the UK, charge their students approximately five times more than Taiwanese universities do.
While tuition fees in Germany are similar to those in Taiwan, the German government covers a majority of the charges. Taxes are also higher in Germany than in Taiwan.
The Taiwanese government is reluctant to increase subsidies — with the exception of project-based funding for a handful of universities — and yet, forbids universities to increase tuition fees.
If Taiwanese universities cannot compete internationally through higher standards or lower fees, they will be reduced to competing on low costs at the expense of quality, as the manufacturing sector did in the past.
Universities are left with three options: fund-raising, turning a profit or cutting costs.
Fund-raising is targeted; the money is spent on designated purposes, such as on specific scholarships or buildings, and so this does not help in terms of the university’s expenditure.
Profit-making initiatives, such as renting out premises and facilities, or starting or expanding certain courses, will detract from the university’s intended function and affect its academic reputation.
Finally, there is reducing costs, such as a hiring freeze, slashing department budgets, reducing activities or postponing the replacement of equipment and facilities. However, these will only lead to cheapened universities.
Students attending public universities in Taiwan tend to come from a higher socio-economic background than those studying at private universities, yet they also enjoy better educational resources.
Disadvantaged students account for approximately 9 percent of the population at public universities, compared with 12 to 23 percent for private schools. The former pay on average NT$50,000 per academic year in tuition fees compared with NT$110,000 for the latter.
The government should allow public universities to increase their tuition fees, and then reallocate funding to subsidize students at private universities.
Wealth disparity is increasing, and one of the most important strategies for reducing this disparity would be to improve the socio-economic status of disadvantaged students through the reallocation of education resources.
With government funding, it would be possible for there to be parity between tuition fees for universities in both sectors.
The government needs to do more than reallocate education resources between public and private universities. It should also require each institution to undertake an internal reallocation of resources. This would entail changing the tuition fee structure to benefit the disadvantaged by, for example, providing scholarships to those who cannot afford to pay.
Chan Chih-yu is a professor at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.