In an interview published recently in the Chinese-language magazine Wealth, which focuses on financial affairs, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) especially pointed out misunderstandings he believes the media have had about him for a long time now.
Ma said that he has never said that he cares about going down in history as the person who facilitated unification between Taiwan and China, but that he is concerned with how he is perceived in history.
During the interview, Ma stated his intent more clearly by saying that he wants to be remembered as the leader of the government that brought about the most peaceful and stable period in cross-strait relations since 1949.
That peace and stability is based on the concepts of the “1992 consensus” and “one China, with different interpretations” and so, Ma hopes to use a meeting between himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to consolidate these concepts and turn them into a “highly stable framework” for dialogue.
During the interview, Ma added that this is the only path of action available and that it is something that cannot be pushed. This is supposed to mean that’s all there is to a meeting between Ma and Xi and that there is no need for us to worry.
However, Ma has lost all his credibility, not just domestically, but also internationally.
Since coming into office, Xi has cracked down on corruption within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and this has met with resistance from within the CCP.
Under Ma’s leadership, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has become involved in a whole series of corruption scandals and these without a doubt provide very good ammunition to mock Ma for those within the CCP unhappy with Xi’s crackdown on corruption.
Also, it is now evident that China knows full well that the political situation in Taiwan cannot be decided on by one person or one party.
Just what sort of extra costs will have to be paid when such a person or such party begs for audience with a much stronger other? This is something that we will have to pay close attention to.
Furthermore, the CCP has never agreed with the idea of “one China, with different interpretations” and has constantly stressed that there is no room for discussion when it comes to the “one China” principle.
Xi offended a huge number of people within the CCP during his crackdown on corruption, so why would Xi back down on the “one China” principle just for some political hack from Taiwan and give those inside the CCP an excuse to pick fault with him?
Xi has already gotten himself into all sorts of strife over the issue of meeting with Ma. For Ma to expect Xi to make a clear concession and agree to the idea of “one China, with different interpretations” is absolutely delusional.
Christian Fan Jiang is deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry