On June 16, the British newspaper the Times published an article by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強), in which Li explained the purpose of his upcoming trip to London. The most important point was that he wanted to show the “real China” and change misunderstandings about the country that are prevalent around the world.
Just what does he mean by the real China? Does it refer to the cooperation and peace that Li has been touting? According to the British media, Beijing demanded a meeting between Li and Queen Elizabeth II, otherwise agreements purportedly worth US$30 billion would be canceled. China’s ambassador to Britain has also warned Britain that if it wants to establish strong economic relations with Beijing, it should tone down accusations about China’s human rights record.
This year is the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the China-Britain comprehensive strategic relationship. It is the first time a Chinese leader has visited Britain since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) came to power.
In a break with diplomatic procedure, China and demanded that Queen Elizabeth receive Li and his wife, which Britain agreed to. As such, the relative power of the two nations is evident. As was the press conference between British Prime Minister David Cameron and Li, the main focus of which was the value of trade represented by Li’s delegation of more than 200 Chinese businesspeople — almost half of the annual trade between Britain and China, which is about US$70 billion.
Whether Cameron obediently keeps his silence about the issue of human rights — after he angered Beijing in 2012 when he met with the Dalai Lama — will influence the message that Britain sends to the rest of the world, as well as its international image.
In reality, the international community does not have many misconceptions about China. Apart from governments in Africa and Latin America that rely on Beijing’s financial assistance, a majority of countries are unimpressed with the way Beijing engages in cash diplomacy and favor-buying with countries.
Xi’s leadership has been characterized by this approach. Xi’s status as a “princeling” means he has a strong reluctance to be anyone’s lackey. This is a common trait of the second generation of China’s political elite and thus Beijing has not been afraid of throwing its weight around when it comes to the East China Sea, the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait.
At a meeting at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi delivered a speech that illustrated a common theme of his governance: He demanded that Chinese scientists guard key technologies to safeguard national competitiveness and development.
He blamed China’s backwardness in modern history, and its lagging behind the West and Japan, on the fact that it was never able to transform technological know-how into useful applications.
Nationalism born of a historical sense of humiliation is at a peak now in China. All Beijing’s major policies are directed toward China making a comeback and taking its rightful place in the world, running counter to the understanding of “peace” that democratic countries have.
Tomorrow, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) is to achieve something unprecedented in that role: He will begin a four-day visit Taiwan. It comes not long after all the fuss caused by TAO spokesperson Fan Liqing’s (范麗青) statement during a Beijing press conference that Taiwan’s future “must be decided by all Chinese people.”
China is conceiving ways to control the pace of development in cross-strait relations. Does the government know about this and what preparations has it made?
These issues are very serious and related to the future survival of Taiwan. They cannot be resolved by empty soundbites such as the idea that Zhang’s visit to Taiwan represents a historic moment in cross-strait relations.
The purpose of Zhang’s visit to this nation is clear, and that is to continue Beijing’s unification strategy. The goal will not change, but Beijing’s tactics to meet the objective can.
Over the past six years, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), led by President Ma Ying-jeou ( 馬英九), has been the first to help the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) achieve its goals and this is why we have seen the formation of an elite CCP-KMT platform.
China has conducted its diplomacy globally by offering business deals, but this strategy has recently met with disapproval in Taiwan, leading to change in Zhang’s approach for his trip, which is now focused on visiting students and grassroots groups.
This leads us to the question: Which side has time on its side?
This long-disputed issue is something that the nation’s younger generations have already responded to clearly in staging the Sunflower movement and related protests.
If China’s attitude that a strong nation must bully others to carry out its bidding does not change during Xi’s period in office, then Taiwanese really need to think seriously about what will happen in the future.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations