Agriculture is one of the key issues concerning the proposed free economic pilot zones, and the same issue will come up in relation to future trade agreements — for example the cross-strait agreement on trade in goods, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). An early response is necessary, otherwise fierce protests will break out and rifts will continue to open up in society.
Some farmers in Taiwan are keen to absorb new knowledge and boldly engage in innovation. Their agricultural products are of high quality and often acquire certification. Quality differentiation enables such products to compete with imported agricultural products that are cheap but may be associated with food safety risks, and some are destined for the export market.
Products such as these are not threatened by the competition that trade liberalization would encourage, but they account for only around 20 percent of Taiwan’s total agricultural output.
Most farmers are limited by factors such as scale of production, capital, technology and markets. They are often affected by imbalances between production and sales, causing prices to fall so low that they may not even be able to cover production costs. They cannot compete with mass imports of low-priced goods from overseas, so they are naturally very worried about liberalization.
This is the true picture of Taiwan’s rural areas today. Hastily cutting import tariffs and opening up domestic markets would have a big impact on the majority of farmers, so it is not without reason that farmers and agricultural pressure groups are strongly opposed to such measures.
“Added value in agricultural production” will be of little help if Taiwan’s farming sector has to bear the impact of wave after wave of liberalization. It will be necessary to thoroughly assist farmers in upgrading and making whatever adaptions are needed.
Agricultural policy reform must start out from national land planning. This involves drawing red lines concerning farmland and regional distribution, in order to ensure food security.
The farmlands in question should not be rezoned for other purposes without going through a strict review procedure. As for short-term subsidies and compensation, although they are indeed necessary, agricultural transition and technical upgrading are more important still.
Issues such as structural adjustments, enhanced competitiveness, higher farming incomes and stronger labor performance in agriculture all need deep-reaching reviews and improvements. People who are willing to go on working in the farming sector must be helped to upgrade in all areas, whether it is business concepts, production and sales techniques, environmental preservation or food safety. The scale of ordinary-grade farming needs to be reduced, while the scale of high-grade farming should be expanded.
Besides providing assistance in the form of funding, technology, information and so on, staff assignment at government-run experimental and research institutes and agricultural research and extension stations needs to be adjusted, as do the duties assigned to the people who work there. Existing arrangements regarding the acquisition and allocation of intellectual property rights and technology transfer licensing fees need to be reviewed, in an all-out effort to help farmers achieve the goal of upgrading.
Unless these things are done immediately, future conflicts are inevitable. Let us all keep an eye on the government and urge it to stop wasting time and get moving.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics and former director of the Yunlin County Government’s Department of Agriculture.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.