Agriculture is one of the key issues concerning the proposed free economic pilot zones, and the same issue will come up in relation to future trade agreements — for example the cross-strait agreement on trade in goods, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). An early response is necessary, otherwise fierce protests will break out and rifts will continue to open up in society.
Some farmers in Taiwan are keen to absorb new knowledge and boldly engage in innovation. Their agricultural products are of high quality and often acquire certification. Quality differentiation enables such products to compete with imported agricultural products that are cheap but may be associated with food safety risks, and some are destined for the export market.
Products such as these are not threatened by the competition that trade liberalization would encourage, but they account for only around 20 percent of Taiwan’s total agricultural output.
Most farmers are limited by factors such as scale of production, capital, technology and markets. They are often affected by imbalances between production and sales, causing prices to fall so low that they may not even be able to cover production costs. They cannot compete with mass imports of low-priced goods from overseas, so they are naturally very worried about liberalization.
This is the true picture of Taiwan’s rural areas today. Hastily cutting import tariffs and opening up domestic markets would have a big impact on the majority of farmers, so it is not without reason that farmers and agricultural pressure groups are strongly opposed to such measures.
“Added value in agricultural production” will be of little help if Taiwan’s farming sector has to bear the impact of wave after wave of liberalization. It will be necessary to thoroughly assist farmers in upgrading and making whatever adaptions are needed.
Agricultural policy reform must start out from national land planning. This involves drawing red lines concerning farmland and regional distribution, in order to ensure food security.
The farmlands in question should not be rezoned for other purposes without going through a strict review procedure. As for short-term subsidies and compensation, although they are indeed necessary, agricultural transition and technical upgrading are more important still.
Issues such as structural adjustments, enhanced competitiveness, higher farming incomes and stronger labor performance in agriculture all need deep-reaching reviews and improvements. People who are willing to go on working in the farming sector must be helped to upgrade in all areas, whether it is business concepts, production and sales techniques, environmental preservation or food safety. The scale of ordinary-grade farming needs to be reduced, while the scale of high-grade farming should be expanded.
Besides providing assistance in the form of funding, technology, information and so on, staff assignment at government-run experimental and research institutes and agricultural research and extension stations needs to be adjusted, as do the duties assigned to the people who work there. Existing arrangements regarding the acquisition and allocation of intellectual property rights and technology transfer licensing fees need to be reviewed, in an all-out effort to help farmers achieve the goal of upgrading.
Unless these things are done immediately, future conflicts are inevitable. Let us all keep an eye on the government and urge it to stop wasting time and get moving.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics and former director of the Yunlin County Government’s Department of Agriculture.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations