Compared with the Act for the Establishment and Management of Free Trade Zones (自由貿易港區設置管理條例), gaps and omissions in the draft regulations for free economic pilot zones give the authorities concerned free rein to do as they please.
Also, clauses that would safeguard the rights of workers have inexplicably been omitted altogether.
It is quite clear that the draft is intended as a way to open the door to China and it is likely to distort the nature of the pilot zones.
Just like the free trade zones, the pilot zones would also provide perks such as tax breaks or exemptions.
However, the draft regulations say that when a foreign-owned company establishes or commissions a business to warehouse or carry out simple processing for it in one of the pilot zones, the international firm will benefit from an exemption in the profit-seeking enterprise income tax if its goods are to be sold on the global market.
If such goods are then sold on the domestic market, it will enjoy a 10 percent tax exemption on its annual sales value.
Moreover, when businesses import materials from China to the pilot zones, such importation will not be restricted by Article 35 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例).
This law concerns products or items listed in the government’s “prohibited category” and is based on considerations of national security and industrial development.
That means the 2,186 prohibited Chinese products, including 830 kinds of raw materials for agricultural products, will be allowed to enter Taiwan at that point.
The draft regulations also propose to loosen the restrictions on Chinese professionals working in the nation, and this clause is a potential threat.
The act for free trade zones already has regulations on the opening up the market to foreign goods and talent, and therefore Taiwan will not become an “isolated country” at all.
As the draft regulations for the pilot zones further erode restrictions, the government is opening the door to China by promoting “deregulation.”
In terms of the free trade zones, they refer to “controlled districts” at six international seaports and one international airport, their neighboring areas and certain other areas where the tracking of goods via technology is available.
The application for the establishment of a business in the free trade zones is regulated by the act.
However, the pilot zones can be established not only in various science and industrial parks, but also in areas designated by the authorities of state-run enterprises or local government heads.
From urban renewal plans to land use changes and even environmental impact assessments, policy implementation is under a “one grade, one review” system that makes the establishment of pilot zones much more convenient, and certain areas can even be designated as virtual pilot zones.
No wonder some are saying that “there will be pilot zones within the pilot zones,” that “there are pilot zones everywhere in Taiwan” and even that “Taiwan is just one big pilot zone.”
Such complete opening up of the domestic market without the necessary caution will distort the nature of the pilot zones and it might be an obstacle to the nation’s international negotiations in the future.
The government should change its method of “covering the bads and praising the goods” and stop claiming that there will be more gains than losses.
Rather, it should face society’s doubts squarely and review the impact of its policies from the point of view of public interest, regional balance and industrial development.
Then it should honestly report the gains and losses in detail to the public. The scope of the pilot zones should not exceed that of the free trade zones.
Shieh Jyh-cherng is a retired National Taiwan University professor. Frida Tsai is an assistant professor at Shih Hsin University’s Graduate Institute for Social Transformation Studies.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under