In early March, a mysterious ship the size of a large passenger ferry left a Romanian wharf, glided through the narrow Bosphorus Strait that separates Europe and Asia, and plotted a course toward Scandinavia.
About a month later, at the fenced-in headquarters of Norway’s military intelligence service, the country’s spy chief disclosed its identity. It was a US$250 million spy ship, tentatively named Marjata, that is to be equipped with sensors and other technology to snoop on Russia’s activities in the Arctic beginning in 2016.
“There is a demand from our political leadership to describe what is going on in this region,” Norwegian Lieutenant General Kjell Grandhagen said in an interview at the hilltop surveillance base outside Oslo.
Of particular interest, he said, are Russia’s ambitions to develop oil and gas and shipping opportunities in the Arctic — and the “military aspects in terms of being able to defend that.”
As climate change eats away at the sea ice covering the North Pole, Arctic nations are fishing for secrets in East-West spy games echoing Cold War rivalries. The military dimension remains important, but this time there is an economic aspect, too: getting a leg up in the competition for potential oil and gas resources, along with newly accessible shipping lanes and fishing waters.
Even before the Ukraine crisis put a chill on cooperation between Russia and the West in the Arctic — joint military exercises have been suspended and Canada skipped a meeting of an Arctic environmental task force in Moscow in April — Western nations in the region accused Russia and China of launching cyberattacks and other espionage operations.
In Canada, a naval officer was sentenced a year ago to 20 years in prison for spying for Russia. And in December last year, police arrested a Toronto-based employee of Lloyds Register accused of trying to supply China with sensitive information about Canada’s plans to build Arctic patrol ships.
The Chinese government called the allegations groundless.
“Canada has been experiencing levels of espionage comparable to the height of the Cold War,” the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service’s oversight committee said in a report late last year.
The intelligence service has been reorganized to put more focus on Canada’s northern perimeter.
The Arctic — surrounded by the US, Canada, the Nordic countries and Russia — was a fault line during the Cold War as NATO and Soviet submarines spied on each other beneath the ice cap. After a lull following the collapse of the Iron Curtain, the Arctic is regaining its strategic importance as warming makes it more accessible. Summer sea ice reached a record low in 2012, and scientific projections suggest that it could disappear completely this century.
Shipping is already growing, albeit from low levels, in the Northern Sea Route north of Russia. The melt is also opening a new energy frontier — the Arctic is believed to hold an estimated 13 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and 30 percent of its untapped gas.
The most accessible resources are within national boundaries and are undisputed.
Security analysts say the risk of conflict lies further ahead, if and when the ice melts enough to uncover resources in areas where ownership is unclear.
The US, Canada, Denmark, Norway and Russia are expected to have overlapping claims.
Critics say the US is lagging behind in the race.
A recent climate change report by a panel of retired US generals found that despite a slew of planning documents, the US has limited capabilities to operate in the Arctic. It said the US Coast Guard has only one fully ready icebreaker and the US Navy has few ice-hardened vessels that can operate in the Arctic, other than nuclear submarines.
“The geopolitical situation is ever more nuanced and complex. The risk of maritime events, or even unpredictable flashpoints, endemic to national security is growing,” retired US Navy admiral Frank Bowman said in the report.
In April, the first oil supplies were unloaded from an ice-resistant platform in Russia’s Pechora Sea, a development that Russian President Vladimir Putin described as “our first step in developing the Arctic sea shelf.”
Even amid the current focus on Ukraine, Putin stressed at a national security meeting that Russia needs “to maintain Russia’s influence in the region and maybe, in some areas, to be ahead of our partners.”
In 2007, Russia resumed long-range strategic bomber flights over the Arctic and planted a Russian flag on the seabed beneath the North Pole. More recently, it asserted control over the Northern Sea Route with naval deployments and by reopening a military base on the New Siberian Islands.
Meanwhile, Russia has been accused of using clandestine means to glean secrets about the Arctic plans and activities of its Western “partners”: In Denmark, political science professor Timo Kivimaki two years ago lost his job at the University of Copenhagen and served two-and-a-half months under house arrest for violating Danish espionage laws.
The case is classified, but in a rare interview, Kivimaki said he was arrested on his way to a meeting with a Russian diplomat, carrying a briefcase with public documents about Danish experts studying Arctic policy. Kivimaki said he wanted to foster peaceful relations between Arctic stakeholders and denied his activities had anything to do with espionage.
Denmark’s domestic intelligence service, PET, declined to comment on the case.
In Norway, security officials say the country’s Arctic plans and know-how, including cutting-edge technology for offshore drilling in harsh weather conditions, is attracting unwanted attention from foreign spies.
Without mentioning the nations involved, Norwegian counter-espionage chief Eirik Haugland said spies have tried to identify critical points in Norway’s Arctic infrastructure “just in case” of a future conflict.
Haugland said a foreign agent traveled to northern Norway a few years ago to map the landing point of an underwater communications link with Svalbard, a strategic archipelago halfway between mainland Norway and the North Pole.
“If you sabotage this cable, people on Svalbard are quite blind, but also we [on the mainland] are quite blind about what’s going on in Svalbard,” Haugland said.
Documents leaked by former US National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden have prompted Norway to be more open about the fact that spying goes the other way, too.
An NSA document, dated April 17 last year and cited by Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet in December last year, said the Norwegian Intelligence Service had helped the NSA with access to “Russian targets in the Kola Peninsula” — home to Russia’s Northern Fleet — as well as reports on Russian energy policy.
The NSA wanted to deepen its intelligence exchange with its NATO ally “on Russian political, natural resources and energy issues,” Dagbladet quoted the document as saying.
Grandhagen, the Norwegian intelligence chief, declined to comment, but said it is no secret that Norway cooperates on intelligence matters with the US.
“You give something and you get something back in other areas. And we give information in areas where we have a good competence and good access,” Grandhagen said.
Asked what that might be, he said: “I think our understanding of our neighborhood is an area where we are strong.”
Grandhagen said Russia also is modernizing its capabilities to collect intelligence, including in cyberspace. He declined to comment on Russian media reports that Moscow this year is to reopen a Cold War-era military base in Alakurtti, near the land border with Finland, and staff it with surveillance experts to monitor NATO’s activities in the Arctic.
“What I can say is we are aware that Russia has a significant intelligence apparatus, including various means to monitor activity on our side,” Grandhagen said.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry and the SVR foreign intelligence service did not answer requests for comment.
Additional reporting by Matti Huuhtanen, Jim Heintz and Rob Gillies
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry