The abduction of hundreds of young Nigerian girls by the Islamic militia Boko Haram has been front-page news for weeks. The global public is outraged by the group’s violation of fundamental principles and sensibilities: the prohibition of slavery, the protection of personal integrity, the obligation to protect children and the right of adolescent girls to obtain an education and choose when and whom to marry.
Yet the presence of young Nigerian prostitutes on the streets of Western cities barely elicits a reaction.
Indeed, most people simply avert their eyes. And the media barely mention the issue.
Each year, thousands of Nigerian girls are trapped by fanatical and mercenary thugs and forced into prostitution, often in the same wealthy countries that are now magnanimously offering help to Nigeria’s government.
Six of every 10 people trafficked to the West are Nigerian, and at least 60 percent of trafficked sex workers in Italy and Belgium are Nigerian girls.
Across Europe, North America, Russia and the Middle East, these young women are visible to all who bother to look — and have been for decades.
Why is no one outraged? The inconsistency is rooted in the girls’ circumstances: The schoolgirls are innocent victims crying out for protection, while the child sex workers are illegal immigrants, slated for deportation as soon as they are caught.
However, they are the same girls. They all come from impoverished, conservative communities, where girls’ prospects are bleak, owing to the prevalence of child marriage, endemic domestic violence, a lack of educational opportunities and pervasive unemployment.
In fact, according to one Nigerian survey, Nigeria has some of the world’s highest rates of early marriage, with 48 percent of girls married by 15, and 78 percent by 18, in the northwest region of the country.
Moreover, 81 percent of married women admitted to being subjected to verbal or physical abuse by their husbands.
Given high rates of adolescent marriage, it should come as no surprise that the net secondary-school enrollment rate for Nigerian girls in 2008 and 2009 was only 22 percent, compared with 29 percent for boys.
While the specter of unemployment haunts all Nigerians, with only 10 percent of the nearly 6 million young people who enter the labor market each year managing to secure a formal-sector job, the problem is much worse for women, who account for only one-third of those who find a formal job.
Most of the 54 million Nigerian girls and women who live and work in rural areas are forced into insecure employment in the informal economy.
Nigeria’s radical gender inequality reflects a widespread tolerance of discrimination against girls, which facilitates the brutal actions of extremist groups like Boko Haram and creates fertile ground for traffickers.
In such dire circumstances, it is easy to lure girls with false prospects of attractive jobs abroad, often in bars, restaurants and clubs. It is a short step from recruitment to a life of extreme exploitation.
As a result, despite the valiant efforts of human-rights activists, at least 200 Nigerian girls are trafficked to Russia monthly to work as prostitutes, according to Nigerian Ambassador to Russia Asam Asam.
The UN Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute reports that , there are at least 10,000 — and perhaps as many as 20,000 — Nigerian sex workers in Italy, most of them trafficked and many of them young teenagers.
As if that were not enough, to ensure that the girls do not run away or report their abusers, they may be subjected to so-called juju rituals, during which they are sworn to secrecy under pain of severe sanctions.
Although law-enforcement, anti-trafficking and child-protection agencies have long known about these abusive practices, solutions — such as employment schemes, legal immigration status and improved healthcare access — remain absent. National and global leaders are not working to break the cycle of violence.
The problem is not invisible; people simply do not want to see it.
Political leaders and law-enforcement authorities in the West and elsewhere know how Nigerian teenage prostitutes ended up in their cities, but choose to do nothing to help them — or, worse, punish them.
Ideally, Boko Haram’s abduction of the schoolgirls would galvanize worldwide support for efforts to protect the rights of African adolescent girls, just as the Pakistani Taliban’s shooting of Malala Yousafzai helped to combat complacency regarding education for girls in South Asia.
The question is whether the global public will demand action to protect young Nigerian girls’ basic rights and freedoms, or merely continue to condemn distant brutality while acquiescing in it on a nearby street corner.
Jacqueline Bhabha is a professor of the practice of health and human rights at the Harvard School of Public Health, director of research at Harvard’s Francois-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights and a lecturer at Harvard Law School.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations