Prime ministers, presidents and chancellors from across Europe dined in Brussels on Tuesday night and digested the verdict from their respective disenchanted voters. Many arrived as walking wounded, their credibility battered, their reputations bruised, their policies discredited.
French President Francois Hollande led his Socialist Party to a historic defeat on Sunday at the hands of the Front National, a party rooted in racism and anti-Semitism.
British Prime Minister David Cameron arrived as the only Conservative leader to take his party to third place in a national election.
Illustration: Mountain People
Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras traveled to Brussels after being beaten by the young left-wing firebrand Alexis Tsipras and his anti-austerity Syriza movement.
Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt, who has been tipped for a top EU job, saw her center-left government badly hit by the nationalist anti-immigrant Danish People’s Party.
Presiding over the dinner was European Council President Herman van Rompuy, anxiously wondering about his legacy and who will take over his job later this year.
It will be weeks before the dust settles on the political earthquake that has seen fundamental shifts in British, French, Greek and Danish politics, and wrought big changes in Scandinavia, Ireland, Spain and Italy.
Already attempts are under way to play down the impact of the vote and to belittle the new class of European lawmakers as noisy, rude and extremist, but also fractious and unable to hold together to get their anti-European way.
However, the incoming nationalists, neo-fascists, establishment baiters and hard leftists will make it trickier for the mainstream to push through its legislative agenda on everything from trade pacts with the US to climate change to immigration policy.
Cameron’s free-market reform agenda may also fall victim to a parliament that will be more protectionist, more anti-US and more pro-Russia.
Almost a third of the new parliament, albeit a motley crew, will be broadly or fervently anti-EU. The establishment response is likely to be a Berlin-style grand coalition of mainstream Christian and Social Democrats, ignoring the upstarts and pushing through their “more Europe” agenda.
The problem is that the two big blocs make up a mere 53 percent of the new chamber, down from 61 percent, highlighting the erosion of centrist political appeal and the domination of politics by the center-right and the center-left. At the last election in 2009, the two big Spanish parties took 80 percent between them. On Sunday that collapsed to just under 50 percent.
The other problem with grand coalitions is that when it comes to countering demagoguery and populism, they commonly become part of the problem rather than the solution.
Deals and policies are stitched up behind the scenes, rubber-stamped by safe parliamentary majorities, leaving the only opposition to the anti-elitist movements hammering on closed doors.
The elections exposed how what started as a banking disaster five years ago, then developed into a financial, debt and currency emergency, has come to roost as a political crisis, testing the competence of and confidence in European leadership.
For Germany, the EU powerhouse, the two big causes for concern are the eurozone’s second and third economies, France and Italy.
Both are under the center-left, both are struggling with parallel issues of loss of competitiveness, structural rigidity, high youth unemployment, poor public finances and a seeming inability to reform.
Yet Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi took on the Five-Star insurgents of Beppe Grillo with an avowedly and aggressive pro-European message. He routed them, while Hollande consolidated his reputation as France’s least popular president ever and, for the French elite and the center, led the country to a moment of shame.
With his talk of curbs on immigration, limits on freedom of movement in the EU and benefits tourism, Cameron sought to halt the march of the UK Independence Party. He failed.
Europe’s leaders will issue pieties about the need for growth and jobs, divided about how to get there and looking over their shoulders.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry