Prime ministers, presidents and chancellors from across Europe dined in Brussels on Tuesday night and digested the verdict from their respective disenchanted voters. Many arrived as walking wounded, their credibility battered, their reputations bruised, their policies discredited.
French President Francois Hollande led his Socialist Party to a historic defeat on Sunday at the hands of the Front National, a party rooted in racism and anti-Semitism.
British Prime Minister David Cameron arrived as the only Conservative leader to take his party to third place in a national election.
Illustration: Mountain People
Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras traveled to Brussels after being beaten by the young left-wing firebrand Alexis Tsipras and his anti-austerity Syriza movement.
Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt, who has been tipped for a top EU job, saw her center-left government badly hit by the nationalist anti-immigrant Danish People’s Party.
Presiding over the dinner was European Council President Herman van Rompuy, anxiously wondering about his legacy and who will take over his job later this year.
It will be weeks before the dust settles on the political earthquake that has seen fundamental shifts in British, French, Greek and Danish politics, and wrought big changes in Scandinavia, Ireland, Spain and Italy.
Already attempts are under way to play down the impact of the vote and to belittle the new class of European lawmakers as noisy, rude and extremist, but also fractious and unable to hold together to get their anti-European way.
However, the incoming nationalists, neo-fascists, establishment baiters and hard leftists will make it trickier for the mainstream to push through its legislative agenda on everything from trade pacts with the US to climate change to immigration policy.
Cameron’s free-market reform agenda may also fall victim to a parliament that will be more protectionist, more anti-US and more pro-Russia.
Almost a third of the new parliament, albeit a motley crew, will be broadly or fervently anti-EU. The establishment response is likely to be a Berlin-style grand coalition of mainstream Christian and Social Democrats, ignoring the upstarts and pushing through their “more Europe” agenda.
The problem is that the two big blocs make up a mere 53 percent of the new chamber, down from 61 percent, highlighting the erosion of centrist political appeal and the domination of politics by the center-right and the center-left. At the last election in 2009, the two big Spanish parties took 80 percent between them. On Sunday that collapsed to just under 50 percent.
The other problem with grand coalitions is that when it comes to countering demagoguery and populism, they commonly become part of the problem rather than the solution.
Deals and policies are stitched up behind the scenes, rubber-stamped by safe parliamentary majorities, leaving the only opposition to the anti-elitist movements hammering on closed doors.
The elections exposed how what started as a banking disaster five years ago, then developed into a financial, debt and currency emergency, has come to roost as a political crisis, testing the competence of and confidence in European leadership.
For Germany, the EU powerhouse, the two big causes for concern are the eurozone’s second and third economies, France and Italy.
Both are under the center-left, both are struggling with parallel issues of loss of competitiveness, structural rigidity, high youth unemployment, poor public finances and a seeming inability to reform.
Yet Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi took on the Five-Star insurgents of Beppe Grillo with an avowedly and aggressive pro-European message. He routed them, while Hollande consolidated his reputation as France’s least popular president ever and, for the French elite and the center, led the country to a moment of shame.
With his talk of curbs on immigration, limits on freedom of movement in the EU and benefits tourism, Cameron sought to halt the march of the UK Independence Party. He failed.
Europe’s leaders will issue pieties about the need for growth and jobs, divided about how to get there and looking over their shoulders.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under