Former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairperson Tsai ing-wen (蔡英文) was again elected as chairperson on Sunday in a prelude to a two-year period that could determine the future for Tsai, the DPP and the country.
As Tsai prepares to take the helm tomorrow following her two previous terms between 2008 and 2012, supporters and observers will watch closely what she does, hoping that this time the 57-year-old can not only revive the DPP, but also win the presidency in 2016.
During her previous tenure, the academic-turned-politician was able to lead the DPP, which had hit its lowest point in 2008 amid corruption scandals involving former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), back to glory after securing a string of by-election victories and generating momentum so strong that most people expected her to beat President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in the general election.
When that did not happen the DPP appeared to return to constant inner struggles between factions, further exacerbating its disconnection from the public. By the time it began paying attention, the party had been marginalized along with the unpopular Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
That is where Tsai comes in, because if she is unable to turn the DPP around, the party’s hopes of returning to power are finished.
Tsai immediately pledged two areas of attention for the DPP — a more open-minded approach to its work with civic groups and a party led by a younger generation of politicians. The challenge is huge, as young politicians’ ability to manage the party without interference from the factions will be problematic, while civil society has always questioned the DPP’s desire to work with it if the party returns to power.
In the short term, Tsai was right that there would be no honeymoon period after taking over the leadership as the seven-in-one elections are only six months away. The DPP is also going to face strong pressure in the legislature from the KMT, which is planning to push through legislation on the cross-strait service trade pact, the free economic pilot zones and the mechanism monitoring all agreements between Taiwan and China.
On the issue of the economic zones, Greater Tainan Mayor William Lai (賴清德) and Greater Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) appear to give their conditional support to the project in light of potential economic gains for the south, while the DPP’s official position remains vague, although it has voiced serious concerns.
Tsai will also be engaging in other ambitious initiatives, such as constitutional reform. It will perhaps take more than two years to build consensus because Ma opposes reform, while public opinion favors a parliamentary system and the DPP remains divided between a presidential or parliamentary system.
However, no issue will be more important to both Tsai and the DPP than the party’s China policy. Especially to Tsai, whose “Taiwan consensus” initiative doomed her presidential campaign after she was viewed by Washington and Beijing as “empty” and lacking substance, the new round of China policy formulation will be a deciding factor of her future.
The chairperson-elect will have to find a way to address the DPP’s pro-independent position, which has been at the heart of the argument between the party’s liberal and conservative wings. While some proposed to freeze the DPP’s independence charter as an “olive branch” to Beijing, others have said that this is unnecessary.
Most importantly, whether the next two years will be a success for Tsai might be unrelated to policy, as the former presidential candidate has been described as “another Ma Ying-jeou,” who only trusts people in her inner circle.
A worst case scenario would be Tsai’s rivals in the party simply waiting for her to fail, instead of working with her to return the DPP to prominence.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s